Showing posts with label population health. Show all posts
Showing posts with label population health. Show all posts

Anal Cancer Detection (Mejia Powell, 9/17/25)

 A recording of this presentation is available HERE.

Dr. Rob Mejia Powell gave a really awesome talk this week about Anal Cancer Screening. He reminded us that, while anal squamous cell carcinoma-- almost entirely HPV-related -- is rare in the overall population (1-2 cases/100K person years). While most people are not high risk and should NOT be screened, there are higher risk populations who should definitely be screened with anal pap smears and referred to high resolution anoscopy (HRA), which is available through SRCH for internal and external referrals. Take a look at his presentation for some really great info. If you just want the brief notes, you'll miss out on the butt jokes. 

Here's a reminder of what patients with anal cancer "look like", survivors of anal cancer:   https://youtu.be/QYR3GWWAmjE?si=kolJuD1TrdgWXMBU

"Say the word 'anal anal anal' a million times until your friends get used to it."

Take a look at this table to see the relative incidence in certain risk categories:

Known risk factors include age, HPV infection (especially vulvar neoplasia in women), receptive anal intercourse, and immunosuppression (e.g. HIV, chronic steroid/immunosuppressants). Also note that the highest growing group in women.

Pathogenesis of anal cancer is similar to cervical cancer:  Exposure to HPV > persistent infection > precancerous high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL, anal intraepithelial neoplasia (AIN grades 2 or 3)) > invasion to ASCC


Who should be screened?

  • People with HIV
  • MSM (especially with HIV)
  • Women with history of cervical/vulvar/vaginal neoplasia
  • Transgender women
  • Solid organ transplant recipients, IBD (esp perianal Crohn's) and those on chronic immunosuppressants
Does screening work?
The ANCHOR Trial, published in NEJM 2022 was a multi-site RCT that showed that, YES, screening at risk populations does work to prevent anal cancer. Primary outcome: anal cancer. Test subjects: Men with HIV age >35. Study found 9 anal cancers in the treatment group (those screened>> HRA>> treatment) vs. 21 cancers in the observation group. This equates to a 60% decrease in anal cancer.

How to approach the topic of anal cancer screening with patients:
1) Explain what an anal pap smear is: what are we looking for? what are we trying to prevent? 
2) Get an HPI: anal itching? bleeding? pain? difficulty stooling? presence of anal lesions?
3) Anal Pap: get cytology and HPV prior to digital exam>> use Dacron swab (wet with water, place 2-3 inches across anal verge, aggressive angling)
4) Digital anal rectal exam (DARE)
5) Refer abnormal anal paps to high res anoscopy (HRA) (see chart)

Summary chart: 



Is it Vaccine Hesitancy? (Thompson 9/22/2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Cherriese Thompson for a thought-provoking Grand Rounds this week titled "Is it Vaccine Hesitancy?" in which she explored the historical and present day impediments that make it challenging for BIPOC to accept and receive the COVID-19 vaccine and discussed ways to mitigate barriers to vaccine admin and acceptance. 

Dr. Thompson defined vaccine hesitancy as: "a delay in acceptance of refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services". This definition, Dr. Thompson, told us, assumes a level of complacency, convenience and confidence. We may want to question these assumptions. 

A recording of her presentation is available HERE.

Here are my notes:

We all know that COVID-19 disproportionately affected BIPOC in the US with increased rates of hospitalizations and death over population levels (see image below)


Racial breakdown of vaccine trials: while these vaccine trials have been praised for inclusion and diversity, there is still much work to be done to be sure they are reflective of the population


Rates of vaccination by race/ethnicity (updated 9/21/2021):


Concerns about COVID-19 vaccination in communities of color include medical and structural racism, as well as historical and present day trauma

For Black/African American people
  • Centuries-long history of experience of discrimination in health care, being ignored or dismissed: "if you haven't cared about me in the past, why should I believe you care about me now?
    • slave ships in Middle passage: sick slaves thrown overboard or forced treatment
    • medical experimentation on black women's bodies
    • withholding medical treatment for slaves
    • 1973: yellow fever outbreak, one physician believed black people were immune and didn't give treatment
    • 1932-1972 Tuskegee study, knowingly withheld treatment to 400 black men for syphilis to watch the progression (100+ died) 
  • Concerns about vaccine incentives: lack of trust in governmental organizations 
  • "Medical racism: The New Apartheid" antivax organization, film specifically targets black communities, weaponized history of experience of black people, "should you really get this vaccine?", false claims regarding potential vaccine harm
  • Social media: misinformation on Twitter and FB, e.g. Nicki Minaj (famous rapper) on Twitter:

For Hispanic/Latinx people
  • concerns about female fertility
  • concerns that the vaccine contains stem cells, ethical to take vaccine if prolife?
  • worries that the vaccine itself may give you COVID
  • Spanish language information (on Whatsapp and Telegram channels) discuss ineffectiveness of masks, vaccine ineffective
  • Vaccine being used to track down immigrants and deport them
For Native American/Indigenous
  • historical trauma leading to skepticism
    • 1970: Family Planning Act: sterilization of more than 25% Native American women without consent
    • 1989 Havasupai Tribe asked for assistance from John Martin, anthropologist to understand diabetes in their community; blood samples provided were used without their consent to study schizophrenia, alcoholism, inbreeding and origins and migrations of their people
  • concern people might be injected with COVID from the vaccines
  • huge concern about speed of manufacture
  • historical distrust: "Am I willing to gamble that they care this time?"
  • lack of involvement of their own populations in clinical trials
And, unfortunately, this is not just about historical trauma, but ongoing/current lived experiences for BIPOC
Reframe. This is NOT hesitancy. There are real impediments, many impediments. 
  • Among the impediments: skepticism, lack of accurate information, actual vaccination access, including online only signups, issues with appointment scheduling transportation
  • Having the time to be vaccinated: working multiple jobs
  • Valid concerns about being unable to get vaccinated due to vaccine side effects and not be able to take time off work, or because you are caring for others
  • Pharmacy Deserts (residents living >1/2 mile from a pharmacy), many exist in communities of color. A lot of these communities lack reliable transportation to get/to from pharmacies to get vaccines. CVS, Rite Aid, Walgreens, local pharmacies may not have capacity to carry and administer these vaccines 
Okay, what can we do?

1) Get more BIPOC included in clinical trials
  • recruitment of diverse populations, particularly Native American communities-- working with sovereign government and respecting data sovereignty
  • FDA: Enhancing the Diversity of Clinical Trials, ideas include reducing visit frequency, provide flexibility, using electronic communication if possible
  • PhRMA's Equity Initiative
    • building trust and acknowledging mistrust
    • reducing barriers to clinical trials access
    • utilizing real world data
    • boost info of diversity and inclusion in clinical trial participation

2) Increase access to trusted information
  • There is so much misinformation/disinformation out there, more accessible
  • meet people where they are: go into the community, being present to answer questions
  • being a resource to isolated populations
  • Empower individuals to question info they see on social media, question the source, question the validity
  • Provide trusted information: Voto Latino partnered with another organization to provider accurate info to Latinx (they also partnered with Uber/Lyft to transport Latinx to vaccination)
  • CDC: information on vaccine equity, increasing uptake in racial/ethnic communities, communication toolkits, printed resources and posters in multiple languages

3) Improve access to vaccination sites
  •     mobile vaccination units
  •     reach places where access to healthcare is already a problem (rural and urban)
  •     targeting opening vaccination sites within vulnerable communities (i.e. Roseland Library)
  •     pop up vaccination sites
  •     home vaccination (to the most vulnerable)
  •     clinics and pharmacies providing access

4) Foster trust and utilize empathy
  • creating a space for patients in the room
  • take the power away, ask the patient "Can I talk to you about the COVID vaccine? What are your concerns? What have you heard about it? How has it affected you?"
  • Create open dialogue to explore skepticism
  • foster continued discussion
  • provide accurate information
  • show empathy: patients often will trust their doctor over time, if they felt heard/held

5) Shift the blame
  • there will be skepticism; don't blame the individual patient for their skepticism
  • relieve the blame to foster an environment of trust and open dialogue

6) Increase BIPOC pipelines in healthcare
  • more funding and access for BIPOC in healthcare
  • "Because I am black, and I have been vaccinated. . .and I hear your concerns. . .Here is what I experienced." That means so much to a lot of my black patients
7) Dismantle structures of racism inherent in medicine

Elimination of TB in the US: 2021 Updates (Toub, 8/4//2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Danny Toub, a family physician, teacher, and public health professional-- who so often bridges the impossible gaps that exist between individual patient care conundrums and public health. While this bridge may seem intuitive, it is often rickety and not always clear how to begin to build it-- look to Dr. Toub, though, he always shows us the way. 

A recording of his presentation is available HERE. 

This week's topic was Tuberculosis (TB), a global behemoth; the original and ever-present airborne illness that still kills 1.4 million people worldwide per year, more than HIV/AIDS While we sit in the middle of a harrowing COVID-19 Pandemic and the words N-95 have become every day jargon, TB is still global problem. And while we have made great progress in the US with TB eradication, TB still unnecessarily killed 542 Americans in 2018, 200 of which were right here in California.

TB, much like COVID, disproportionately affects people who are living in poverty, people of color, and those who have less access to stable housing and health care services.



What is our responsibility as primary care providers?

  • Screen ALL patients for TB Risk
  • Screen HIGH RISK patients with a Tuberculin Skin test (TST) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA)
  • Treat Latent TB infections (LTBI)
  • Report to Public Health any active TB cases and/or any LTBI in children or recent converters (<2 years)
  • Oh, and don't forget to have TB on your ddx for other acute/subacute illness presentations!
If we break that down,
1) Screen ALL patients for TB Risk using the California TB Risk Assessment Tool which can be found HERE and is pictured below as well. 

Remember to AVOID testing low risk folks for LTBI (this form alone counts as a screen!) and if you have limited resources, prioritize those who are most likely to convert from LTBI to active TB. Key risk factors include being foreign born/immigrant from certain regions, immunosuppression, and those who have been in close contact with someone with TB. 

Important additional risk factors include, recent conversion, substance use disorder, patients with DM, patients with CKD, those with autoimmune conditions, people who smoke, people with cancer, and more. 

The point of screening is to prevent a future conversion to active TB by treating people before they get sick. Low risk patients have ~10% lifetime risk of converting. Higher risk (e.g. people with diabetes) have ~ 30% lifetime risk, and highest risk folks (e.g. HIV + LTBI) have a 7-10% per year risk of converting. 

2) Screen HIGH risk patients with TST or IGRA. The best TB test depends on your pretest probability. Here is a good cheat sheet.
#Note that the CDC no longer recommends annual TB testing for healthcare workers!! Official recommendations released in 2019 are available here and recommend a risk based technique. Maybe that means YOU don't need that annual TST!

*TST: tuberculin skin test, **IGRA: interferon gamma release assay (often referred to as quantiferon gold). There is limited data in IGRA in children <5. IGRA are more specific than TST in pts with a history of a BCG vaccine.

+Remember, a negative IGRA or TST does NOT rule out active TB (you need sputum!)

3) Treat LTBI infection. Treatment for LTBI has been shortened and simplified over the last decade. It does not involve routine lab work (except in high risk folks) or directly observed therapy (DOT). 



Dr. Toub recommends this handy LTBI pocket card to help simplify your decision-making and treatment regimen planning. The image below to too small to actually read, but follow the link for specifics on indications, completion criteria, considerations, etc. 

Briefly, prior to initiating LTBI treatment, you want to be sure to r/o pregnancy, check for pre-existing peripheral neuropathy (which can be a side effect of tx), screen for liver disease risk factors (e.g. alcohol use disorder, NASH, HCV). 

Baseline LFTs are only indicated for patients with HIV, known liver disease, regular alcohol use, pregnancy or < 3 months postpartum, and other risks for liver disease.




And, Dr. Toub reminded us to remind your patients that EVERYthing will be orange (sweat, tears, and urine). Also be sure to check for drug drug interactions on any tool that you use for this purpose, as there are many. 

4) Report to SoCo Public Health any active TB cases and/or any LTBI in children or recent converters (<2 years). 

5) Oh, and don't forget to have TB on your ddx for other acute/subacute illness presentations! Remember TB can show up just about anywhere. 

For local assistance, you can utilize the Sonoma County TB Control Guidelines, which you can find at the bottom of this webpage. And if you ever have any TB questions, reach out to our local TB Control program at 707-565-4567.

And, finally, a list of trusted resources from Dr. Toub:




End of Life Care: Cultural Values in the Latinx Community (Panameño, 3/3/2021)

Dr. Karla Panemeño gave thought-provoking and important Grand Rounds this week on End of Life Care: Cultural Values in the Latinx Community. You can watch a recording of her presentation here: video to be uploaded.

Dr. Panemeño began her presentation with a brief history of hospice, and she pointed out that hospice is very much a "western phenomenon" with much of Latin America is still lacking the concepts of hospice and palliative care principles embedded in their own healthcare systems. She also reminded us that the Latinx community is the fastest growing ethnic minority group in the US, and that the COVID-19 Pandemic has disproportionately affected Latinx in our country (3x the hospitalization rate) and our own local community (while Latinos make up 27% of our SoCo population, they comprise 67% of our cases).

There is mixed evidence on Latinx use of end of life services, but generally the Latinx community tends to be less likely to have an advanced care plan and less likely to take advantage of hospice service. There are many reasons why this may be true, including: language barriers, financial barriers (many immigrants are not eligible for Medicare), knowledge about the resources, and cultural values.

Dr. Panameno then spent a good percentage of her remaining time describing key Latinx cultural values that may influence the interactions of Latinx patients with end of life care. She encouraged us that recognizing these cultural values may help us give better care. She reminded us, however, to be careful not to generalize, as the Latinx population in the US is itself a diverse group of people. Also, being aware of an immigrant patient's level of acculturation is important in understanding how these values shape their decisions

  • Familismo (family unit)
  • Personalismo (personal interactions)
  • Respeto (respect)
  • Confianza (trust)
  • Fatalismo (fatalism)
  • Dignidad (dignity)


For me, exploring these cultural values and how to integrate them into the care of acutely and chronically ill and dying patients is such an important take home message.

Here are a few pearls:

Familismo is a family centered model of decision-making highly valued in the Latinx community, may be valued more than autonomy (whereas medical system often values autonomy over all else), involves broad networks of support that extend beyond the nuclear family 
  • this may be seen in medical decisions being made as a family unit, rather than by an individual
  • also family members very much see themselves as caretakers and often have a strong sense of duty to care for their dying family member
  • How do we navigate familismo in the care of patients?
    • identify the family spokesperson
    • actively engage family members in decisions
    • educate and support the whole family
Respeto is a notion that relationships are based in common humanity, and one must establish respect as part of that relationship
  • this may be seen in hierarchy within families as to who is designated spokesperson
  • patient and family may not be assertive in expressing their concerns, disagreements with clinicians
Personalismo is a value that places an emphasis on your personal interactions, rapport is built on warmth and regard
  • pleasant and agreeable conversations with healthcare provider (even when they disagree)
  • may not want to disclose poor prognosis to the patient
  • How do we navigate personalismo and respecto in the care of patients?
    • Be respectful (in the language you use, who you address, etc)
    • Respect the familial hierarchy
    • Give families time to process
    • Take time to know each member of the family -- don't underestimate the value of family 
Confianza is trust in a person with the belief that the other person in the relationship has your best interests in mind.
  • many Latinx patients have experienced discrimination based on race, language, etc in the healthcare setting
  • How do we navigate confianza?
    • follow up on promises, spend additional time with patient/family, make small talk, have open dialogue about prejudice, discrimination, language barriers
    • use important key community members (e.g. pastor)
Dignidad: feeling worthy and valued
  • may manifest as anxiety at time of death, fear/anger around dying, 
  • How to navigate? Open conversation with family members, be curious about the feelings in the room
Fatalismo: a belief ones future is not in your own hands, not in your own control
  • patients may seek care late in their illness
  • may express hope for a miracle
  • How to navigate? Explore thoughts/feelings/values, validate the role of others' control

I encourage all of us who take care of Latinx patients to consider how these cultural values may influence our patients' interactions with us and with the healthcare system, and not to overgeneralize but rather apply this lens humbly in how we care for patients.

COVID-19 Vaccine Update (Green, 12/16/2020)

Okay, so often enough when I am writing these summaries, I cannot do the speaker justice with my summary; this time the ante is upped. If you haven't gotten a chance to listen to Dr. Gary Green's Grand Rounds from 12/16/2020 and you are wondering about the science behind these vaccines, please watch it. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBTnlrcHaKU&feature=youtu.be

For those of you who prefer written word, here are my summary points:

COVID-19 is raging in the California right now, over 60,000 cases reported yesterday. In SoCo, we had a reported 606 cases yesterday-- that is more than triple our previous high from last week. Some experts have called this "the third wave", but Dr. Green referred to our current California and local surge as our "second wave" because California didn't see a surge back in April/May when NYC did (see image below).


Historical context
Dr. Green encouraged us to reflect upon the tremendous historical impact of this pandemic, comparing peak daily death rates to Pearl Harbor, D-day and 9-11, which were each ONE day events. We have had many days and days of equivalent number of deaths during 2020. 
Looking at the 1918 flu epidemic, it's important to note that the initial pandemic included THREE waves (spring, fall, winter) that spanned the first 1 1/2 years of the pandemic but that the pandemic flu strain (in the absence of a vaccine)  wreaked havoc for several years after the initial 3 waves (1921, 22, and 23, see image). Hopefully vaccination will save us from such a long tail!

Multi-pronged strategy to control COVID-19 in our communities
We should remember that management of this pandemic has several key public health pillars, which remain important. The vaccine is additive to the important strategies already being implemented. These include:
  • Full PPE for healthcare workers with care of COVID patients and PUIs
  • Surgical masks at all times
  • Frequent hand washing
  • Social distancing when possible (6 feet)
  • Break room modification to avoid crowding
  • Avoid carpooling or socializing outside of work/family
  • Avoid social mixing (keep your bubble small)
  • Vaccination
Vaccination
On 12/11/2020, the Emergency Use Authorization was approved by the FDA for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine for COVID in persons >16 years and older. On 12/17, the advisory committee is meeting to review the mRNA vaccine from Moderna for persons >18 and older. It is expected to be approved also under EUA. 

Vaccines in the pipeline
Experts agree that we need multiple different vaccines to be able to fill the world's supply. There are currently 160+ vaccines in preclinical trials, 1 (Pfizer) approved last week for EUA and a second likely to be approved within days, and . To track these vaccines, you can follow their progress at the NY Times vaccine tracker: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/science/coronavirus-vaccine-tracker.html


What do we want a vaccine to do?
  • prevent infection
  • prevent illness
  • prevent severity/fatality if you get sick
  • prevent transmission
What is this new mRNA technology and should I trust it? It all happened so fast. . .

First of all, scientists have been working on this mRNA technology for many years, decades in fact. Both the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccine use the mRNA of the COVID-19 spike protein to provoke an immune response. You can NOT get COVID from the vaccine. While you are right, this was quite quick, it's not out of nowhere. Over the last two decades, there have been rapid improvements in vaccine creation: the SARS vaccine was created in 20 months (2003), H1N1 (2009) in just 9 months (2009), and Zika in 3.25 months (2013). The science is sound. 

How effective is the mRNA vaccine?
Both mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) are designed to require two doses. It appears that after two doses, both vaccines are 94-95% effective. This is MUCH better than anyone could have hoped for; in fact, several months ago, the FDA said that it wouldn't consider a vaccine to be approved unless it was at least 50% effective. This is so much better than that!

See the data below from the Pfizer study in the image below. In this study of 44K people, the vaccine demonstrated 52.4% efficacy after first dose (there were 39 cases of COVID in the vaccine group and 82 in the placebo group), but 95% after the second dose, given 21 days later (162 cases in placebo group, 8 cases in the vaccinated group, none severe).

What about the vaccine side effects?
Yes, the Pfizer vaccine is a reactogenic vaccine (think Tetanus shot or Shingrix). Many folks will have a sore arm (84%). More than half will get fatigue (62.9%) and headache (55.1%), and a significant amount will get muscle aches (38.3%), joint pains (31.9%), chills (23.6%), and fever (14.2%).   The Moderna vaccine has very similar side effect profile (e.g. 90% injection site reactions and 68% fatigue, and 15% fever). Expect more side effects after the second dose than the first.

Also of note are a few unique events, including lymphadenopathy and a higher than expected rate of Bell's Palsy. Also reported in post-marketing (not during the study) are 3 events in UK and 2 in the US of anaphylactic-like reactions, almost all of which occurred in people with a history of anaphylaxis. This is being watched closely. The CDC recommends patients be observed for 15 minutes after injection to be sure they don't have such a reaction (30 minutes if you have hx of anaphylaxis). They are recommending if you have had anaphylaxis specifically to any vaccine, you should not get it at this time.

What about pregnancy and lactation?
Pregnancy and lactation were both excluded from both Pfizer and Moderna studies. However, in both studies, there were incidental pregnancies and no demonstrated adverse outcomes. The FDA says pregnancy is NOT a contraindication. ACOG and SMFM take it a step further: both recommend the vaccine in the 2nd and 3d trimester.

Are there any contraindications?
People who have had COVID-19 are recommended to get the vaccine, 90 days after infection. But, at this point, there are no known clinical contraindications. . As it is NOT a live vaccine, immunocompromised folks are safe getting it, there is no evidence of neurological side effects, folks with GBS are recommended. 

How do we get to herd immunity?
Dr. Green walked us through the notion of the basic reproduction number of a virus (R0, thought to be around 2.5-3.5 for COVID-19 under natural circumstances). He explained how both the R0 of COVID-19 AND the specific vaccine efficacy ultimately determine our ability to achieve herd immunity. 

Remember that herd immunity occurs when a large portion of a community (the herd) becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. As a result the whole community is protected (not just those who are immune). For the math geeks out there, refer to this paper from the Lancet. Basically we need to get 63-75% of the population vaccinated with either of these current 94% effective vaccines to get to herd immunity. 


Final take homes:
1) Get vaccinated! 2 doses, either vaccine
2) Because this is being licensed under the emergency use authorization (EUA), vaccine is highly recommended but not mandated for all persons >16 years old
3) Moderna vaccine is likely to be approved and distributed in a matter of days (doesn't need to be kept at sub-zero temperatures, similar side effect profile, similar efficacy, may ultimately be easier to distribute to community). 
4) Getting vaccinated does NOT mean we can abandon the rest of our public health pillars. We will still continue to need to use PPE in the healthcare setting, wear masks, maintain social distancing, keep our social bubbles small, and wash our hands like our lives depend on it.

Aftermath of the 2017 Wildfires: WHAT-now-CA* Study Results on Needs, Respiratory Health, and Mental Health (Hertz-Picciotto, 11/3/2020)

Great thanks to Dr. Irva Hertz-Picciotto and graduate student in public health, Diego Rivera, from UC Davis' Environmental Health Sciences Core Center for their update this week on the WHAT-now-CA* StudyAftermath of the 2017 Wildfires. 

Their research team is following a cohort of people who lived through the Northern California fires of 2017 (including Tubbs, Nuns, Atlas, and Redwood Valley fires). They are studying both the short and long-term health impacts of these fires. The study features data from several counties, but the bulk of participants in their cohort are from Sonoma County.

Diego Rivera presented data on physical and mental health needs in 2018 and 2019, and Dr. Hertz-Picciotto presented health impact data, including respiratory and mental health, from year 1 (2018). 

(By Phoenix7777 - Own workData source: VIIRS-AF Active Fire Detections for CONUS - 10/07/2017 through 10/14/2017 0200 MDT)
For many of us who lived through the 2017 fires and the ensuing years of smoke, fire and more evacuations, the study findings are not terribly surprising: greatest reported needs in year 1 (2018) included: clean air, clean up, insurance help, finding housing, and help with refurnishing homes

  • greatest reported needs in year 2 (2019) included: mental health, improved health, clean air
  • people with underlying pulmonary issues experienced increased respiratory symptoms after fire and smoke exposure; some with no underlying lung disease also had respiratory symptoms
  • mental health needs increased after the first year's needs (e.g. housing, clean up, insurance issues) were addressed.

Mental Health Impacts of Fire 

There is a paucity of literature on the impact of wildfires on mental health, but a few studies that have been reported recently from fires in Canada and Australia have found high rates of PTSD in the early months following a fire event, as well as high rates of generalized anxiety and depression.

In the WHAT-now-CA study, adults and children are asked to report rates of agitated behavior, anxiety and stress, depressed moods, difficulty concentrating, loss of appetite, trouble sleeping/nightmares, as well as substance use (including alcohol, smoking, vaping). 

Dr. Hertz-Picciotto's team found high rates of all of the above symptoms in fire survivors, extra high rates of anxiety and stress and trouble sleeping/nightmares in children. They also have found a very strong correspondence between an adult in the home having mental health symptoms and children having these symptoms. Mental health symptoms were more frequent in children ages 12-17 than younger children, also more frequent for those who have experienced multiple evacuations, and those whose home was destroyed. 

I look forward to seeing ongoing data collection from Dr. Hertz-Picciotto--  perhaps if we can have concrete data demonstrating the long-term physical and mental health impacts of these fires on our community, we can actually help to do something about them. . . and eventually heal.

Be safe all, the rains are close.


(*Wildfires and Health-Assessing the Toll in Northern California)




HIV Update for Primary Care (Toub 9/2/2020)

Dr. Danny Toub, our local HIV expert, gave an information-packed grand rounds presentation this week on HIV.  In the 1990s, HIV was the #1 cause of death among US persons ages 25-44. Great strides have been made over the last two decades. While HIV death rates continue to downtrend, there are still 1.17 million people living with HIV in the US. There are 149,500 people living with HIV in California and about 2,000 in Sonoma County. 

Unfortunately, rates of new infection are disproportionately highest in black and brown men who have sex with men (MSM). In fact, the lifetime risk of acquiring HIV for an African American MSM is 1 in 2!

The Basics:

CD4 counts are used to stage disease

  • normal CD4 >500
  • HIV (not AIDS) > 200
  • AIDS: <200 or Opportunistic infection (OI)/Cancer
HIV Viral Load is used to monitor response to antiviral therapy 
  • normal: undetectable
  • goal: unmeasurable
  • high: >200K
Take home point #1: Viral suppression is KEY KEY KEY in HIV management
  • 2018 viral suppression rates now reach 81-90% in most populations (lower in youth and patients with unstable housing, but much better than a decade ago)
  • The US Government has rolled out a program with the goal of reducing HIV new diagnoses by 75% in 5 years and 90% in 10 years using the FOUR Pillars of ending the HIV epidemic:
      • Diagnose all people with HIV as early as possible
      • Treat people with HIV rapidly and effectively to reach viral suppression
      • Prevent new HIV transmission by using PrEP and syringe services
      • Respond quickly to new HIV outbreaks
Take home point #2: There are so many HIV Resources for you to rely on for help. Here are Dr. Toub's recommendations
  • Team VIDA MD on call 707-583-8823 (24/7)
  • National HIV curriculum: www.hiv.uw.edu
  • CCC (Clinical Consultation Center): http://nccc.ucsf.edu
  • Pacific AETC Quick Guide (26 page): http://paetc.org/
  • Podcasts: https://thecurbsiders.com/tag/hiv
  • Crushing and Liquid formulations of ART: https:/hivclinic.ca

Take home point #3: Antiviral Therapies (ART) are so much simpler than they used to be. Many regimens are just one pill once a day!

  • Current ART Guidelines include an initial regimen of 2 NRTIs + INSTI (now available in combination forms)
    • Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTIs) are in: abacavir, emtricitabine, lamivudine, and tenofovir (AF or DF)
    • Integrase inhibitors (INSTI) are in: bictegravir, dolutegravir, raltegravir
  • Protease inhibitors (PIs) are out
  • Boosters are out
Take home point #4: Start ART in anyone diagnosed with HIV as soon as possible (within 2 weeks in anyone with OI), call team VIDA for any questions.
  • HIV replication increases mortality
  • Benefits of early treatment outweighs risk (ACTG A5164 Study)
    • this is particularly true in PCP but also in cryptosporidiosis, microsporidiosis, PML, Kaposi's sarcoma and serious bacterial infections
      • possible exceptions: cryptococcal meningitis, TB, CNS toxoplasmosi
Take home point Point #5: Ambulatory Care of stable patient with HIV is much like care of all our patients with any chronic disease:
  • Chronic Disease 101 (a la Danny Toub)
    • Is the medicine you are taking effective? (--> viral load)
    • Are you able to take your medications? (access ($$, pharmacy issues), adherence, tolerance)
    • Can we do better? (i.e. side effects, pill burden, etc)
  • Routine labs (DHHS ART Guidelines table 3: www.aidsinfo.nih.gov/guidelines)
    • HIV Viral load and CMP q 6 months
    • HbA1C, lipids, urinalysis (if CKD), RPR, GC/CT (3 site),, +/- HCV, CBC (CD4)
  • Health Care Maintenance: www.hiv.uw.edu/go/basic-primary care
    • Vaccination
    • Cancer Screening
Take home point #6: Treatment=Prevention
  • "People who take ART daily as prescribed and achieve and maintain an undetectable viral load have effectively NO risk of sexually transmitting the virus to an HIV negative partner"
  • Undetectable= Untransmittable (U=U)         U=U taking off in 2017 - The Lancet HIV
Take home point #7: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PreP) is an amazing and underutilized HIV biomedical prevention tool. If you do reproductive services in your primary care practice (i.e. birth control and STD testing), you should also be doing PrEP
  • PrEP is safe 
  • PrEP is effective 
    • if men take  >4x/week
    • if women take 6-7 times per week
  • PrEP is patient centered 
  • PrEP is paid for! (as a Grade A USPSTF recommendation
  • However, only 1% of African Americans and 3% of Latinos who would benefit are on PrEP
  • We should be offering PrEP to ALL:
    • Sexually active adults and adolescents who have had any anal or vaginal sex in the past 6 months AND 1) have an HIV+ sexual partner OR 2) Recent bacterial STI OR 3) Hx of inconsistent or no condom use with partners
    • Person who injects drugs AND has a HIV+ injecting partner OR shares drug prep or injection equipment
  • Just need negative HIV test before rx, no s/sx of acute infection, normal renal function, no contraindicated meds
  • Rx TDF/FTC OR TAF/FTC once daily
    • Monitoring visit q90 days: check HIV status, pregnancy test, renal function, STI screen, risk reduction counseling
  • Online Prep learning opportunities:
    • Quick HIV clinical guide
    • National HIV curriculum
    • HIV prevention Certified Provider ProgramPrEP4Love. One Pill. Once a Day. Protect Against HIV
And finally, my own personal reflections from working with Danny and listening to him speak:
be strength based
be non-judgemental
be kind
be there for patients ALWAYS


Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis (Hamann 7/23/2026)

 A recording of this presentation is available HERE .  *** Thanks so much to Dr. Kendal Hamann, SMGR Endocrinologist, for an outstanding Gra...