A recording of the presentation can be viewed HERE.
Showing posts with label COVID-19. Show all posts
Showing posts with label COVID-19. Show all posts
Pandemic Pearls and Pivots: A Public Health Perspective (Drs. Mase & Shende, 5/25/2022)
Many thanks to our SoCo Public Health Officer, Dr. Sundari Mase and our SoCo Vaccine Chief, Dr. Urmila Shende for an excellent Grand Rounds this week on Pandemic Pearls and Pivots: A Public Health Perspective.
A recording of their presentation is available HERE.
As we all know, COVID-19 has taken a great toll on our world, our nation, and our county. As of this week, there have been 6.28 million deaths worldwide (probably an underestimate), >1 million US deaths (more have died from COVID-19 than HIV/AIDS, the 1918 influenza pandemic), 90,000 deaths in California, and 491 deaths in Sonoma County. This has led to the largest drop in life expectancy since WWII. And we know that there have been disproportionate numbers of cases, hospitalizations, and death among people of color.
Key SoCo public health interventions during the COVID-19 Pandemic
- Building Public Health testing capacity
- SoCo regional lab has done 206,000 (of 1.6 million PCRs total) to date in SoCo
- State of California and FQHC partnerships
- Focus on equity
- bilingual messaging
- pop up testing sites (using local data to determine neighborhoods for sites)
- bilingual/bicultural testing/contact tracing
- With increase in Ag testing (no longer have a denominator), we are beginning to pivot toward wastewater surveillance
Public Health Mitigation Measures
- Communication campaigns, outreach, press conferences
- re. masking, hygiene, social distancing, gathering size limitations
- reaching so many different sectors, subgroups was VERY challenging (e.g. reaching the elderly: age, transportation, low tech)
- local radio, social media: FB, instagram, etc, flyers
- work with community based organizations, promotoras essential
- Shelter in place (averted huge surge/disaster early on)
- Alternate care site/non-congregate site (for people with unstable housing, served thousands of people, SSU>>hotels)
- State, local and Bay Area health orders to protect vulnerable populations
- Vaccines
Disproportionate impacts of COVID
- Magnification of underlying/pre-existing disparities
- Latinx residents: largely essential workers, hardest hit
- 27% of our population is Latinx, accounted 45% of all cases
- at one point, case rate was 9X higher for Latinx
- In 2020, life expectancy decreased by 2.1 years in Latinx population (compared to 0.7 years in White SoCo population)
- Addressing these inequities, THE PUBLIC HEALTH CHALLENGE of this pandemic
- Health Equity Working Group helped get services to vulnerable population
- trusted messengers (community health workers, promotoras)
- vaccines, masks/PPE, rental assistance
- CURA: important partner to reach community, ensuring financial assistance provided to people who needed it ($8 million)
- FQHC network for collaboration--> 13 different vaccine sites to prioritized populations
- Special shoutout to Dr. Jenny Fish and Dr. Panna Lossy for uplifting the voices of vulnerable communities
COVID-19 Deaths
- 75% of SoCo deaths were in people >65
- residents of skilled nursing facilities were particularly vulnerable prior to the introduction of vaccines
Vaccine Rollout
- SoCo PH chose to prioritize the most vulnerable residents for vaccine roll out
- older adults (65+, 75+)
- SNF and residential care facility patients (RCF)
- Essential workers and marginalized communities (health workers, farm workers, food service workers, homeless)
- We have very high degree of vaccination in our elders: 93% of those >65 are fully vaccinated
- Vaccination of vulnerable elders reduced deaths at SNFs and RCFs
Vaccines work! The reduce infection, hospitalization, and deaths.
 |
| from https://socoemergency.org/ |
In summary, Drs. Mase and Shende highlighted this list of pearls in public health management of this pandemic: data-driven decision making, constant pivoting, expanded communication, collaboration with all the health care entities in SoCo, importance of community outreach and trusted messengers, and ultimately active listening.
Is it Vaccine Hesitancy? (Thompson 9/22/2021)
Many thanks to Dr. Cherriese Thompson for a thought-provoking Grand Rounds this week titled "Is it Vaccine Hesitancy?" in which she explored the historical and present day impediments that make it challenging for BIPOC to accept and receive the COVID-19 vaccine and discussed ways to mitigate barriers to vaccine admin and acceptance.
Dr. Thompson defined vaccine hesitancy as: "a delay in acceptance of refusal of vaccines despite availability of vaccine services". This definition, Dr. Thompson, told us, assumes a level of complacency, convenience and confidence. We may want to question these assumptions.
A recording of her presentation is available HERE.
Here are my notes:
We all know that COVID-19 disproportionately affected BIPOC in the US with increased rates of hospitalizations and death over population levels (see image below)
Racial breakdown of vaccine trials: while these vaccine trials have been praised for inclusion and diversity, there is still much work to be done to be sure they are reflective of the population
Rates of vaccination by race/ethnicity (updated 9/21/2021):
For Black/African American people
- Centuries-long history of experience of discrimination in health care, being ignored or dismissed: "if you haven't cared about me in the past, why should I believe you care about me now?
- slave ships in Middle passage: sick slaves thrown overboard or forced treatment
- medical experimentation on black women's bodies
- withholding medical treatment for slaves
- 1973: yellow fever outbreak, one physician believed black people were immune and didn't give treatment
- 1932-1972 Tuskegee study, knowingly withheld treatment to 400 black men for syphilis to watch the progression (100+ died)
- Concerns about vaccine incentives: lack of trust in governmental organizations
- "Medical racism: The New Apartheid" antivax organization, film specifically targets black communities, weaponized history of experience of black people, "should you really get this vaccine?", false claims regarding potential vaccine harm
- Social media: misinformation on Twitter and FB, e.g. Nicki Minaj (famous rapper) on Twitter:
- concerns about female fertility
- concerns that the vaccine contains stem cells, ethical to take vaccine if prolife?
- worries that the vaccine itself may give you COVID
- Spanish language information (on Whatsapp and Telegram channels) discuss ineffectiveness of masks, vaccine ineffective
- Vaccine being used to track down immigrants and deport them
For Native American/Indigenous
- historical trauma leading to skepticism
- 1970: Family Planning Act: sterilization of more than 25% Native American women without consent
- 1989 Havasupai Tribe asked for assistance from John Martin, anthropologist to understand diabetes in their community; blood samples provided were used without their consent to study schizophrenia, alcoholism, inbreeding and origins and migrations of their people
- concern people might be injected with COVID from the vaccines
- huge concern about speed of manufacture
- historical distrust: "Am I willing to gamble that they care this time?"
- lack of involvement of their own populations in clinical trials
And, unfortunately, this is not just about historical trauma, but ongoing/current lived experiences for BIPOC
- 2.2020: Jean-Paul Mira, French intensivist suggested studying COVID in Africa where there are no masks, no ventilators, no resuscitation--> propose trialing meds in Africa to ensure safety
- 9/2021: Arkansas prisons: physicians giving ivermectin without consent (experiment) to treat COVID-19, "we never knew they were running experiments on us"
- 9/2020: ICE detention centers in Atlanta: immigrant women having hysterectomies without their consent/knowledge
- 2020 Dr. Susan Moore, family medicine physician and geriatrician in Indiana, died of COVID-19 2 weeks after videoing her story and expressing concern that her treatment at her local hospital was compromised due to her being black: having been called a drug seeker. "I put forward and I maintain that if I was white, I wouldn't have gone through that . . .This is how black people get killed: when you send them home, and they don't know how to fight for themselves."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7v1Oyp_bBGk
- Among the impediments: skepticism, lack of accurate information, actual vaccination access, including online only signups, issues with appointment scheduling transportation
- Having the time to be vaccinated: working multiple jobs
- Valid concerns about being unable to get vaccinated due to vaccine side effects and not be able to take time off work, or because you are caring for others
- Pharmacy Deserts (residents living >1/2 mile from a pharmacy), many exist in communities of color. A lot of these communities lack reliable transportation to get/to from pharmacies to get vaccines. CVS, Rite Aid, Walgreens, local pharmacies may not have capacity to carry and administer these vaccines
1) Get more BIPOC included in clinical trials
- recruitment of diverse populations, particularly Native American communities-- working with sovereign government and respecting data sovereignty
- FDA: Enhancing the Diversity of Clinical Trials, ideas include reducing visit frequency, provide flexibility, using electronic communication if possible
- PhRMA's Equity Initiative
- building trust and acknowledging mistrust
- reducing barriers to clinical trials access
- utilizing real world data
- boost info of diversity and inclusion in clinical trial participation
2) Increase access to trusted information
- There is so much misinformation/disinformation out there, more accessible
- meet people where they are: go into the community, being present to answer questions
- being a resource to isolated populations
- Empower individuals to question info they see on social media, question the source, question the validity
- Provide trusted information: Voto Latino partnered with another organization to provider accurate info to Latinx (they also partnered with Uber/Lyft to transport Latinx to vaccination)
- CDC: information on vaccine equity, increasing uptake in racial/ethnic communities, communication toolkits, printed resources and posters in multiple languages
3) Improve access to vaccination sites
- mobile vaccination units
- reach places where access to healthcare is already a problem (rural and urban)
- targeting opening vaccination sites within vulnerable communities (i.e. Roseland Library)
- pop up vaccination sites
- home vaccination (to the most vulnerable)
- clinics and pharmacies providing access
4) Foster trust and utilize empathy
- creating a space for patients in the room
- take the power away, ask the patient "Can I talk to you about the COVID vaccine? What are your concerns? What have you heard about it? How has it affected you?"
- Create open dialogue to explore skepticism
- foster continued discussion
- provide accurate information
- show empathy: patients often will trust their doctor over time, if they felt heard/held
5) Shift the blame
- there will be skepticism; don't blame the individual patient for their skepticism
- relieve the blame to foster an environment of trust and open dialogue
6) Increase BIPOC pipelines in healthcare
- more funding and access for BIPOC in healthcare
- "Because I am black, and I have been vaccinated. . .and I hear your concerns. . .Here is what I experienced." That means so much to a lot of my black patients
7) Dismantle structures of racism inherent in medicine
Many thanks to Dr. Susan Milam Miller, who gave an excellent Grand Rounds this week titled "Caring for our Children, our Family, and Ourselves during COVID-19". Dr. Milam Miller covered a range of topics about our mental health in this pandemic-- from March 2020 as Alexander and the Terrible, Horrible, No Good Very Bad Day, to community and complex trauma, ambiguous loss, and unresolved grief, to trauma-informed care, and even a bit about the magic of a window into children's lives via video visits.
HERE is the recording of Dr. Milam Miller's presentation.
Here are my notes:
Dr. Milam Miller reminded us that no child exists as as single entity-- children exist within their natural environment, including their families and their community. Listening between the lines to children and their attached adults is important. Knowing what their natural environment looks like is also key.
Clearly, here in Sonoma County, many children (and adults) have lived the trauma of several fire seasons and evacuations, compounded for the last year and a half by the COVID-19 Pandemic. These traumas have caused a tremendous amount of stress for many of us-- children are no exception. As such, we can expect to see signs of traumatic stress in our children.
Traumatic Stress manifests in a range of responses in adults and children:
- Emotional: emotional dysregulation (sadness, fear), numbness, detachment
- Physical: somatization (headaches, stomach aches insomnia), changes in brain function, hyperarousal
- Cognitive: how we think about ourselves and others, triggers, re-experiencing, nightmares/daymares, dissociation, dampening of connection via thoughts and emotions
- Behavioral: the way the mind directs the body: self harm, substances, avoidance (behaviors that are NOT adaptive over time, even if they help at first)
- Interpersonal: pulling away from loved ones, difficulty trusting and forming trusting relationships
Identifying these "adaptive" behaviors that may not serve us over time is key to helping our patients and ourselves survive the trauma.
Community Trauma is a strong and powerful shaper of relationships and health
How does a community emerge from trauma? How do we recover and repair? How do healthcare providers care for their community in times of trauma but also for themselves? How do we model for our children and families what healthy coping with community trauma entails?
Complex Trauma describes both children's exposure to multiple traumatic events—often of an invasive, interpersonal nature—and the wide-ranging, long-term effects of this exposure. ... They usually occur early in life and can disrupt many aspects of the child's development and the formation of a sense of self. In COVID times, the list of multiple traumatic events may be long
- what about medical trauma of repeated COVID testing?
- what about shutting down schools?
- what about losing church and extracurricular activities?
Ambiguous loss is a loss that occurs without closure or clear understanding. This kind of loss leaves a person searching for answers, and thus complicates and delays the process of grieving, and often results in unresolved grief. I personally found myself intrigued for the rest of the day by this notion of ambiguous loss-- classically a dear one who disappears on a hiking trip, never to be found again. What about these years of pandemic create ambiguous loss?
- what does it mean to have never finished fourth grade because schools shut down in March 2020?
- what does it mean not to have a graduation ceremony from high school?
- what does it mean to go through puberty during pandemic times without community support?
Trauma Treatment classically has 3 stages:
- Stage 1: Stabilization and establishment of safety (this may include psychotropic medications, DBT to help managing distress, relationship building)
- Stage 2: Addressing and processing of trauma memories or related beliefs and/or grieving the losses inherent in trauma (this is somewhat controversial but has been standard of trauma treatment)
- Stage 3: Restoring or creating connection between survivors and their communities by increased engagement in meaningful and positive activities and relationships
Unsurprisingly, in trauma healing, relationship building is key.
Trauma informed care
“Trauma-informed care is defined as practices that promote a culture of safety, empowerment, and healing.
- Safety
- Trustworthiness and transparency
- Peer support
- Collaboration and mutuality
- Empowerment, voice and choice
- Culturally, historic and gender appropriate
Relationship and relational care is everything. Dr. Milam Miller says at some point, we expend WAY too much energy on individual treatments and interventions, really we need to consider community interventions, group treatments, and shared treatments. I love
Closing questions to ponder from Dr. Milam Miller
1) Who is your buddy? (i.e. the person you call, lean on, ask for help)
2) What does healthy coping look like in these times?
3) Can you recognize the ambiguous loss of this COVID pandemic for the families you care for? Once recognized, how do we process our grief?
Dismantling the Healthcare Hero (Carmen 8/25/2021)
Many thanks to Dr. Desiree Carmen for an evocative Grand Rounds presentation this week entitled Dismantling the Healthcare Hero. A recording of her presentation-- definitely worth your time and attention-- is available HERE.
Dr. Carmen took the hour to explore the notion of heroism as it applies to medicine. She asked us to question why we liked being called heroes at the start of the pandemic and why that may not feel so good right now-- a year and a half later. And she challenged us to propose alternative narratives to support the systemic change that so many of us wish to see.
Dr. Carmen showed us now-familiar images of healthcare workers as masked altruistic protagonists. As the world shut down in March 2020, she began, we felt the love from companies-- free vacations, discounted goods. . . stories of NYC meeting at 7am to clap for healthcare workers. It felt pretty good to be healthcare hero.
Our egos, after all, were not averse to the notion that we could be heroes. We signed up for this! For physicians, we took the Hippocratic oath; for nurses, the Nightingale pledge. We adhere solidly to notions of altruism, beneficence, justice, non-abandonment and solidarity. And we want to serve.
But, she explained, I wanted to know why society wanted us to be heroes.
Dr. Carmen showed us 3 hero archetypes that Americans particularly admire:
- The Everyman Hero: this is the person with no special skills, one for whom life has thrown an adventure at them, asked to do heroic deeds
- The Classical Hero: someone with special abilities and/or skills that puts them above others in the society and grants them their positionality as hero due to those skills
- The Epic Hero: the person with a noble birth story, larger than life
Which do you identify with? Why?
Dr. Carmen segued from these hero archetypes into the work of James Opie Ursom, a mid-century philosopher who wrote about the supererogatory: that is, morally excellent actions that go beyond the duty of the agent-- more than is asked for. All heroic actions are supererogatory, but not all supererogatory actions are heroic. Heroism involves known involvement with risk. i.e. we must CHOOSE the risk. Well, did we?
Risk has not been in short supply during this pandemic.
But PPE has.
PPE Shortages: We all are well aware of the experience of working without a feeling that we had adequate PPE (e.g. reusing N95s, gowns, etc). This is not unique to this pandemic; it has, unsurprisingly, been experienced in epidemics prior to this (including ebola, SARS, H1N1)
And this predictable lack of PPE is due to a well known multitude of forces that are not aligned to ensure health care workers are guaranteed protection.
 |
Recreated Figure 1 from Cohen J, Rodgers YVM. Contributing factors to personal protective equipment shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic. Prev Med. 2020;141:106263. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106263 |
Of note,
- Hospitals: work off a budget (profit) model; administrators make short term decisions, rather than long-term vision and goals. PPE is not charged/billed to patients or insurance companies. It is simply a cost to hospitals. Therefore they have no motivation to have updated stockpile.
- Demand shock: common during pandemics, leading to hoarding affected PPE, increased cost
- Government: Trump admin in trade war with China, slow to enact defense production act, federal stockpile inadequate (3 million masks, if 30% of population sick we would have needed 3.5 billion masks). Noted, expired federal stockpile, not restocked by prior administrations
- Supply Chain: US is an exporter of health goods, importer of goods from China. Cost 6x Nn5, gowns doubled cost
Duty to care
Healthcare workers have a great social contract with the public: we have a duty to care.
But it's not that simple. The Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Work group states, "The Healthcare worker enters into a broad social contract that not only creates their duty to care, but places obligations on society to keep them as safe as possible"
In this instance society did not keep us safe. And as this social contract disintegrated, our duty to care was undermined.
Race in medicine, racism in medicine.
Of note, Dr. Carmen points out, there were so many people not cared for during the pandemic.
We all remember the widespread demonstrations around the world after the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor-- due to ongoing police violence toward people of color.
There is the reality that medical education and training and medical practice are ripe with racism. Examples Dr. Carmen provided:
- Medical schools continue teach racial inferiority theories-- leading to inequitable management of HF, kidney disease, VBAC. For more information, see this NEJM paper.
- There is the widely-known Tuskegee Syphilis study and its repercussions, where respected clinicians and scientists intentionally harmed black bodies.
- Pediatric ED study from 2019, in which providers less likely to order tests/admissions for Latinx and Black children
- And widely held beliefs amongst medical students and resident trainees measured in 2016 that black people literally have thicker skin than white people and therefore feel less pain.
Race and COVID
Physicians of color are more likely to care for patients of color. They are also more likely to experience discrimination during patient care, have limited financial safety nets for themselves. And, of course, be more impacted by COVID-- both personally and professionally-- during this pandemic.
There is the plain fact that COVID disproportionately affected Latinx and Black people all over the US. This applied to our local cases as well. Physicians of color-- our own trainees here at SRFMR struggled in the winter with their own sense of transference and countertransference as patients of color died before their eyes (see quote below).
Global Inequity
And inequities abound, including in distribution of these highly effective vaccines against COVID-19. Much of the world is anxiously still awaiting access to a vaccine that many Americans are outright rejecting.
What about reciprocity?
In return for accepting personal risk in fulfilling our duty to treat, healthcare workers expected reciprocal social obligations. We wanted people to be careful: to social distance, to wear masks, to limit travel and parties. These obligations would demonstrate support and acknowledge our work in difficult conditions. Unfortunately, however, many in our society-- many of our own beloved patients, in some cases our beloved family members-- have not done a great job of reciprocity.
In fact, basic public health orders: social distancing, masks, and vaccine recommendation have been flaunted. And, yet again, as people have chosen to not be compliant with public health orders, we healthcare workers watch these numbers rise again. And we continue to go to work and care for our patients.
This lack of reciprocity leads us to compassion fatigue. Many of us care for patients all the time who make poor decisions-- watching those intentionally make the decision to NOT get vaccinated adds insult to injury. At this point in the pandemic, it makes us tired. Tired of caring for those who are choosing not to care for themselves.
And, then there is the notion of moral injury, defined as psychological harm caused by transgressing one's deeply held values (altruism, do no harm). We are literally living an allostatic load (getting hit over and over), moments of harm that cause neurologic changes to our brain and, for some, will cause PTSD. Physicians already have higher rates of suicide than general population. We already stink at searching out help. Covid adds to these risks-- making us more socially isolated, reducing our access to support (families and friends) in a profession that does little to seek mental health services
Those of us in Sonoma County who lived through the Tubbs Fire of 2017 and the fires that have since ensued, recognize deeply this graphic on the phases of collective trauma: a sudden impact--> heroic phase--> disillusionment (where we see limitations)--> restoring/rebuilding phase--> wiser living phase.
But, Dr. Carmen points us, COVID feels more like this. Like we might never get to the wiser living phase and are maybe stuck in the disillusionment phase forever. . .
So, says Dr. Carmen, the hero narrative isn't enough. It leaves us feeling let down because it
- fails to address limitations of budget centered hospital model
- is a poor reflection of government inaction
- removes a sense of reciprocity and their responsibility during a global crisis
- centers discussions of racial inequality on individual patients and not institutional change
- did not protect our public health initiatives
- only superficially addresses the mental health efforts of providers
And so, Dr. Carmen proposes, we need to reject the narrative of the healthcare hero and consider one of the rhetorical triangle-- a NEW narrative in which we use our physician experience, our facts and our credibility to share our stories about COVID-19 about healthcare about social inequities and push toward institutional and systems change. here's how:
- Logos: dissect our fact to convince our audience
- public health over profit: with regards to PPE, remove profit motive. Strengthen local and state government to have stockpiles, Change industry policy to less foreign alliance, innovative/reusable PPE. Increase physician training pipelines. Change the way we deliver healthcare (e.g. concierge for safety net, wraparound services), explore models of innovative healthcare
- Ethos: build on ethics, sense of credibility.
- Address racism in medicine. Redesign curriculum to eliminate race-based science, support physicians of color, all healthcare workers of color. Support public health initiatives that use community-based participatory tools to target racial inequality (e.g. Promotora models)
- Pathos: being vulnerable with our emotions.
- Work collectively to build resilience. Support unionized healthcare workers who are most vulnerable (RNs, EVS, resident physicians), build a stronger telemedicine curriculum, normalize time to access mental health resources (encourage healthcare workers to go to those mental health visits), pay appropriately for work/hazard we have experienced. CA AB650 Retention Bonus (hazard pay), and more.
Can we?
Can you?
Yes, Doctors Can Cry Too: Addressing Physician Grief and Moral Injury (Pedraza, 5/26/2021)
Muchas Gracias to Dr. Ruth Pedraza for an important presentation this week on Physician Grief and Moral Injury. Dr. Pedraza was the chief resident in charge of the inpatient adult medicine service at SSRRH during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sonoma County (mid December through mid January of this year). She lead her team with grace. Please take the time to watch a recording of her wonderful and relevant presentation HERE.
For the readers, here are my notes, but first my personal take home: we health care providers, need to acknowledge that this job is HARD, that the pandemic made a hard job harder, and we all have tons of unprocessed grief that we need to address. It doesn't matter if we are just at the beginning of our career or winding down, or somewhere in between. The weight is real.
As Dr. Pedraza said at the start, "The culture of medicine is so so rushed, and sometimes it can deny us the right to stop, to process, and to grieve. I did not feel prepared to support my team for such a traumatic cycle. I did not know how to honor our patients, I did not know what was appropriate."
 |
| Each flame in this image represents a patient death on the Adult Medicine Service during a four week cycle 7, mid Dec 2020-mid Jan 2021 (75% from COVID) |
Physician grief
What is grief? An emotional and physical response to a loss. That loss can be death, but other losses can also provoke grief, including a divorce, losing a friend, losing a job. This has been a year of losses. Emotional grief reactions may include anger, guilt, anxiety, sadness, despair. Physical grief reactions may include trouble sleeping, changes in appetite, physical problems, or even illness. Grief and mourning are different, though we often conflate the two; grief is internal, mourning is an external expression (e.g. crying, art, music, prayer, journaling, etc).
How do you grieve?
Dr. Pedraza reminded us of the 5 stages of grief, outlined by. Dr Elizabeth Kubler Ross (Swiss psychiatrist), based on her work with terminally ill patients (see image below). Initially it was thought that everyone experiences these stages in a linear fashion, but now we know some people may skip some, never experience some, get stuck in certain stages, etc. The truth is that people's responses to grief are very different.
Many physicians witness death in our professional lives, but we have very little training, acknowledgement, and inadequate space in the medical culture to process our own grief appropriately. Physicians experience emotional exhaustion, isolation, shame and guilt. Unprocessed grief leads to trauma. In some ways, our profession punishes doctors for grieving.
We know that physicians can engage in negative coping mechanisms, which can be dangerous for our patients AND our personal lives and families. These may include alcohol, drugs, even firearms
Do doctors grieve when their patients die? Dr. Pedraza cited a powerful study by Granek et al from Canada, interviewing 20 oncologists varying in age, sex, ethnicity and years of experience. She found that oncologists struggle to manage their feelings of grief with the detachment they felt necessary to do their job. More than half cited feelings of failure, self doubt, sadness and powerlessness.
She also found that grief in the medical context is considered shameful and unprofessional. Even though doctors wrestle with experience of grief, they often hide their feelings because it is considered professional weakness. The single most consistent finding in these oncologists was the description of compartmentalization with regards to patient loss.
Compartmentalization is a pretty natural impact of continual loss. Denial, disassociation to describe death of a patient-- leading to unacknowledged grief. Leading to distractedness, inattentiveness, irritability, emotional exhaustion and burnout. They also admitted that this would lead them to provide more aggressive chemo, referral for clinical trial or suggest surgery when actually palliative care would have been a better option for that patient. Also impacting ability to communicate with patients about end of life discussions. Half admitted distancing themselves from dying patients, less overall effort toward the dying patient.
Do you compartmentalize? How does that manifest in your care of patients? What about your care of loved ones?
What is the physician culture about crying and expressing grief? We all express sadness in different ways; there exist generational differences, gender differences, and specialty differences. What about crying in front of patients? Is it acceptable? Is it unprofessional? The prevailing belief in medicine is that physicians should be composed and calm. While it is expected that it may happen, it's expected to occur in a private place. 2009 study noted that 69% of students, 74% of residents self reported crying due to patient losses
 |
| viral photo (and words) Southern California ER MD after 19 year old patient died |
The truth is that patients desire care from doctors who are connected and feel their emotions deeply.
Have you cried with a patient? How did that go? Have you tried not to cry with a patient? Why?
Moral Injury
Reframing clinical distress. There is an increasing awareness of working in medicine, critical care, and terminal illness
Burnout--a constellation of symptoms (malaise, fatigue, frustration, cynicism inefficacy) that arise from making excessive demands on energy, strength or resources in the workplace-- is an important notion in medicine, and more than half of physicians experience these symptoms. However, many clinicians have resisted this characterization because it doesn't quite encapsulate what many physicians feel.
In 2018, Drs. Talbot and Dean wrote an article on the Moral injury; it was titled Physicians aren't "burning out". They are suffering from moral injury. You can find that paper here.
The notion of moral injury is most often described in Vietnam Vets, returning from a war they didn't believe in.
Moral injury occurs when we perpetrate, bear witness to, or fail to prevent an act that transgresses our deeply held moral beliefs. In healthcare, this equates to systems issues that prevent us from putting our patients first.This is an oat that is the core of our working lives. As clinicians we are increasingly forced to consider other demands: EHR, documentation, insurance company, hospital administration. Every time we make a decision that conflicts with our patient's best interest, we feel a sting of moral injustice. The cumulative effect is moral injury.
Whereas the treatment for burnout is affirming individual coping skills (e.g. yoga, mindfulness, wellness retreats, and meditation practice); the treatment for moral injury is aligning the system's goals with the physician's goals. It is absurd to believe that yoga will solve the problem of treating patients who cannot get the correct medical care, having 12 minutes to discuss huge life choices with patients. The moral injury of healthcare is being unable to provide high quality care and healing in the face of our system. So many parts of our medical system prevent us from spending time with patients, fear of litigation causes us to overtest and overtreat, patient satisfaction scores can silence physicians from providing necessary (but unwelcome) advice to patients.
Does the notion of moral injury resonate with you? How so?
The COVID Burden and Unanticipated Grief
The pandemic has brought grief to a different level for many of us.
ICU Physician Perspective. Consider reading this reflection by Dr. Thanh Naville (UCLA ER physician) titled "I am an ICU Doctor. I am haunted by what I've seen during the recent COVID-19 surge." She speaks to the notion of how COVID-19 made it impossible to fulfill her own mission statement: help people. How her sense of defeat has been palpable.
Let's not forget the disproportionate effect of COVID on poor communities and communities of color. This also was palpable this year at SSRRH.
And, lest we forget, the outpatient providers were also impacted tremendously. As quoted one outpatient family physician: "I may not have the acute wound of watching people die of COVID in the hospital, but I have a chronic wound. . the space of holding for death of family members."
What are your wounds from this pandemic? How can you help yourself heal these wounds?
And it's not just health care workers. Our entire communities are grieving loss of jobs, contact, community, travel, etc. We need to grieve as a community. It is okay to cry. Allow ourselves the space to rest and heal.
How can we address Physician Grief?
We may all grieve differently, but grieve we must. For our own good and the good of our patients. Different ideas: death talks, professional grief support, didactic preparation for med students and residents, death rounds (for trainees), personal awareness, writing of clinical obituaries. Many other ways. Each of us must determine most effective personal style for resolving patient loss.
If you need help, here are some resources for physicians, compiled by Dr. Pedraza.
2020 Year in Review (Jimenez, Green 2/24/2021)
Great thanks to Dr. Douglas Jimenez and Dr. Cherie Green for their Grand Rounds 2020 Year in Review. Much of the presentation focused on-- you guessed it-- COVID (that is basically what ALL our lives revolve around these days), with select bonus points on a few other hot topics. Dr. DJ covered the latest and greatest on COVID in OB and Dr. Green did a potpourri of COVID in kids.
The COVID literature is evolving literally day by day, so please take this summary as a point in time update. Our understanding of the disease will continue to evolve as we get more data/studies/literature on these topics. For a video recording of this presentation, click here: VIDEO.
Here are my summary points from this presentation:
COVID OB Management in 2020:
- Pregnant women appear to be at higher risk for severe COVID illness and death
- 5-6% of pregnant women with COVID are hospitalized
- 3x risk ICU, 2.9x risk intubation, 1.7x risk of death
- Pregnant women with severe/critical COVID disease also appear to be at increased risk for preterm birth and pregnancy loss
- 10-25% preterm delivery (induced + spontaneous)
- 60% preterm delivery in critical illness
- Per SMFM, a history of COVID disease is NOT itself an indication for antenatal testing
- use routine indications for antenatal testing
- however, a 32 week growth ultrasound may be considered
- Is COVID an indication for delivery?
- asymptomatic/mild infection: COVID is not an indication for delivery, though can consider delivery if >39 weeks
- severe/critical illness: it is reasonable to consider delivery but mechanical ventilation alone is not an indication for delivery
- if EGA< 32 weeks and considering delivery, also consider proning, ECMO, etc
- Is COVID vaccination recommended in pregnancy?
- Due to lack of data in vaccine trials, the WHO has been "lukewarm" about recommending COVID vaccine, recently adjusting their recommendation to recommend vaccinating women at high risk (e.g. healthcare workers) and those with comorbidities that put them aat increase risk for severe illness (e.g. diabetes, obesity).
- However, it is important to note that the Maternal Immunizations Task Force (which includes many large and reputable organizations including: ACOG, AAFP, IDSA, AAFP) specifically recommend that COVID-19 vaccine be made available to all pregnant women
- they say it is unethical to not offer vaccine knowing that pregnancy is a risk factor for more severe COVID illness
- this should be a shared decision-making conversation with provider on risk vs, lack of safety data
- What about Breastfeeding and COVID?
- CDC recommends ALL women with active COVID continue to breastfeed-- no evidence of COVID in breast milk, benefits>>risks
- should use face mask and hand hygiene with every feed
- Labor support and COVID
- Policies surrounding limitation of support people in labor disproportionately harm women of low SES and women of color, who are also disproportionately affected by COVID-19
- less labor support--> more operative delivery, longer labors, etc
- We should be mindful of these policies and do our best to weigh risks/benefits in our advocacy work
Bonus Pearl: Alcohol in pregnancy. Dr. DJ reviewed a paper from Australia (Association of Perinatal Alcohol Exposure with Psychological, Behavioral, and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Children from the ABCD Study, American Journal of Psychiatry 2020), which found a dose-dependent correlation between ANY alcohol use in pregnancy and psychological/emotional problems and behavioral problems.
- 25% increased likelihood of an ADHD in children exposed to heavier levels of alcohol (approximately 36 drinks) in the first 6-7 weeks of pregnancy.
- Heavier alcohol use during early pregnancy also associated with rule breaking behavior and aggression, 30% higher risk of the child being diagnosed with oppositional defiant disorder
COVID + kids 2020:
Dr. Green reviewed several studies on the impact of COVID on our children. Here are her pearls:
- 2020 study out of China, 123,000 children looking at myopic changes with a 5 month lock down
- in children ages 6-8 years, significant number of children had a clinically significant myopic shift (-0.3 diopters) with higher prevalence of myopia in children compared to previous years
- this was not true in older children (ages 9-12)
- conclusion: home confinement seemed to have a significant effect on vision and myopia rates in children ages 6-8, perhaps because this is a more critical developmental period for this problem
- Clinical pearl: every 20 minutes, have children look up and way from the screen for at least 20 seconds, 20 feet away
- Mental health in children during the Pandemic
- Clark County, Nevada: 19 deaths by suicide
- Riley Hospital, Philadelphia: 250% increase in hospitalization for childhood suicide attempts
- CHO: double rate of childhood suicide attempts compared to 1 year ago
- CDC reports increase in mental health ED visits, sustained since March 2020 (see image)
- 25% increase in children 5-11, 31% in children 12-17, compared to the same period one year prior
- Clinical pearl: Ask ALL children how there mental health is doing during the pandemic. Particularly for teens, consider the use of APPS: including CALM, headspace, COVID coach
- The Safety of School Reopening
SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission in educational settings: a prospective, cross-sectional analysis of infection clusters and outbreaks in England Ismail et al, Lancet December
- prospective study, strict infection control precautions, small groups, low community prevalence
- 1,000,000 students, 500K staff--> 343 total cases of COVID (130 in children, 213 in staff)
- 55 total outbreaks (outbreak defined as more than 1 person, most involved just 2), probable staff to staff in 26 of those outbreaks
- no children hospitalized, 3 adults hospitalized, 1 adult died (contracted from home)
- Summary: SARS-CoV-2 infections and outbreaks were uncommon in educational settings during the summer half-term in England. The strong association with regional COVID-19 incidence emphasises the importance of controlling community transmission to protect educational settings. Interventions should focus on reducing transmission in and among staff”
Incidence and Secondary Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in Schools
Zimmerman et al, Pediatrics 2021- 11 districts in North Carolina, 100K students x 9 weeks
- 32 additional cases of COVID via school transmission
- No instances of child to adult transmission
- Summary:
In the first 9 weeks of in-person instruction in NC schools, secondary transmission of SARS-CoV-2 was extremely low overall, and only involved staff to staff transmission. “Our data support the concept that schools can stay open safely in communities with widespread community transmission.”
COVID-19 Vaccine Update (Green, 12/16/2020)
Okay, so often enough when I am writing these summaries, I cannot do the speaker justice with my summary; this time the ante is upped. If you haven't gotten a chance to listen to Dr. Gary Green's Grand Rounds from 12/16/2020 and you are wondering about the science behind these vaccines, please watch it. Here is the link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cBTnlrcHaKU&feature=youtu.be
For those of you who prefer written word, here are my summary points:
COVID-19 is raging in the California right now, over 60,000 cases reported yesterday. In SoCo, we had a reported 606 cases yesterday-- that is more than triple our previous high from last week. Some experts have called this "the third wave", but Dr. Green referred to our current California and local surge as our "second wave" because California didn't see a surge back in April/May when NYC did (see image below).
Historical context
Dr. Green encouraged us to reflect upon the tremendous historical impact of this pandemic, comparing peak daily death rates to Pearl Harbor, D-day and 9-11, which were each ONE day events. We have had many days and days of equivalent number of deaths during 2020.
Looking at the 1918 flu epidemic, it's important to note that the initial pandemic included THREE waves (spring, fall, winter) that spanned the first 1 1/2 years of the pandemic but that the pandemic flu strain (in the absence of a vaccine) wreaked havoc for several years after the initial 3 waves (1921, 22, and 23, see image). Hopefully vaccination will save us from such a long tail!
Multi-pronged strategy to control COVID-19 in our communities
We should remember that management of this pandemic has several key public health pillars, which remain important. The vaccine is additive to the important strategies already being implemented. These include:
- Full PPE for healthcare workers with care of COVID patients and PUIs
- Surgical masks at all times
- Frequent hand washing
- Social distancing when possible (6 feet)
- Break room modification to avoid crowding
- Avoid carpooling or socializing outside of work/family
- Avoid social mixing (keep your bubble small)
- Vaccination
Vaccination
On 12/11/2020, the Emergency Use Authorization was approved by the FDA for the Pfizer mRNA vaccine for COVID in persons >16 years and older. On 12/17, the advisory committee is meeting to review the mRNA vaccine from Moderna for persons >18 and older. It is expected to be approved also under EUA. Vaccines in the pipeline
What do we want a vaccine to do?
- prevent infection
- prevent illness
- prevent severity/fatality if you get sick
- prevent transmission
What is this new mRNA technology and should I trust it? It all happened so fast. . .
First of all, scientists have been working on this mRNA technology for many years, decades in fact. Both the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccine use the mRNA of the COVID-19 spike protein to provoke an immune response. You can NOT get COVID from the vaccine. While you are right, this was quite quick, it's not out of nowhere. Over the last two decades, there have been rapid improvements in vaccine creation: the SARS vaccine was created in 20 months (2003), H1N1 (2009) in just 9 months (2009), and Zika in 3.25 months (2013). The science is sound.
How effective is the mRNA vaccine?
Both mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) are designed to require two doses. It appears that after two doses, both vaccines are 94-95% effective. This is MUCH better than anyone could have hoped for; in fact, several months ago, the FDA said that it wouldn't consider a vaccine to be approved unless it was at least 50% effective. This is so much better than that!
See the data below from the Pfizer study in the image below. In this study of 44K people, the vaccine demonstrated 52.4% efficacy after first dose (there were 39 cases of COVID in the vaccine group and 82 in the placebo group), but 95% after the second dose, given 21 days later (162 cases in placebo group, 8 cases in the vaccinated group, none severe).
Yes, the Pfizer vaccine is a reactogenic vaccine (think Tetanus shot or Shingrix). Many folks will have a sore arm (84%). More than half will get fatigue (62.9%) and headache (55.1%), and a significant amount will get muscle aches (38.3%), joint pains (31.9%), chills (23.6%), and fever (14.2%). The Moderna vaccine has very similar side effect profile (e.g. 90% injection site reactions and 68% fatigue, and 15% fever). Expect more side effects after the second dose than the first.
Also of note are a few unique events, including lymphadenopathy and a higher than expected rate of Bell's Palsy. Also reported in post-marketing (not during the study) are 3 events in UK and 2 in the US of anaphylactic-like reactions, almost all of which occurred in people with a history of anaphylaxis. This is being watched closely. The CDC recommends patients be observed for 15 minutes after injection to be sure they don't have such a reaction (30 minutes if you have hx of anaphylaxis). They are recommending if you have had anaphylaxis specifically to any vaccine, you should not get it at this time.
What about pregnancy and lactation?
Pregnancy and lactation were both excluded from both Pfizer and Moderna studies. However, in both studies, there were incidental pregnancies and no demonstrated adverse outcomes. The FDA says pregnancy is NOT a contraindication. ACOG and SMFM take it a step further: both recommend the vaccine in the 2nd and 3d trimester.
Are there any contraindications?
People who have had COVID-19 are recommended to get the vaccine, 90 days after infection. But, at this point, there are no known clinical contraindications. . As it is NOT a live vaccine, immunocompromised folks are safe getting it, there is no evidence of neurological side effects, folks with GBS are recommended.
How do we get to herd immunity?
Dr. Green walked us through the notion of the basic reproduction number of a virus (R0, thought to be around 2.5-3.5 for COVID-19 under natural circumstances). He explained how both the R0 of COVID-19 AND the specific vaccine efficacy ultimately determine our ability to achieve herd immunity.
Remember that herd immunity occurs when a large portion of a community (the herd) becomes immune to a disease, making the spread of disease from person to person unlikely. As a result the whole community is protected (not just those who are immune). For the math geeks out there, refer to this paper from the Lancet. Basically we need to get 63-75% of the population vaccinated with either of these current 94% effective vaccines to get to herd immunity.
Final take homes:
1) Get vaccinated! 2 doses, either vaccine
2) Because this is being licensed under the emergency use authorization (EUA), vaccine is highly recommended but not mandated for all persons >16 years old
3) Moderna vaccine is likely to be approved and distributed in a matter of days (doesn't need to be kept at sub-zero temperatures, similar side effect profile, similar efficacy, may ultimately be easier to distribute to community).
4) Getting vaccinated does NOT mean we can abandon the rest of our public health pillars. We will still continue to need to use PPE in the healthcare setting, wear masks, maintain social distancing, keep our social bubbles small, and wash our hands like our lives depend on it.
COVID-19 in Pregnancy (Mason, 8/18/2020)
Many thanks to Dr. Antoinette Mason for her excellent review of the emerging literature on COVID-19 in Pregnancy. As Dr. Mason explained at the start of her presentation, much of the information regarding COVID in pregnancy is based on observational data with recommendations that are expert opinion at best. But as we continue to increase our understanding of this disease, we are gaining a better understanding of its impact on pregnant women and infants. I consider Dr. Mason one of our local experts-- herself having cared for several of our first OB patients with COVID locally this past month. With that, I will do my best to summarize Dr. Mason's key learning points.
Epidemiology
- In the US to date, there have been 16,798 documented cases of COVID-19 in pregnancy, 4,262 hospitalizations, and 37 deaths
- As is true across our country, OB patients of color are disproportionately affected by COVID (Reference: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/cases-updates/special-populations/pregnancy-data-on-covid-19.html)
- Here at SSRRH, we have had 9 total OB patients with COVID ( some only triaged, others admitted). In these patients:
- Gestational age ranged from 22-39 weeks
- 5 have delivered (2 returned later with PROM)
- 2 were picked up by admission screening (asymptomatic)
Is pregnancy a risk factor for COVID-19? Answer: We don't really know.
The incidence of COVID-19 in pregnancy is similar to that of the general population. Several studies suggest that pregnancy and childbirth do not increase the risk of acquiring COVID-19. There is mixed data on whether or not pregnancy worsens the course of the disease. An MMWR from the CDC June 2020 showed the following: pregnant women were 5.4 times more likely to be hospitalized, 1.5 times more likely to be admitted to the ICU, 1.7 times more likely to receive mechanical ventilation, but no increased risk of death. (Reference: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6925a1.htm). Some of these stats are likely impacted by providers being more likely to admit and act more conservatively with sick pregnant women, but it is hard to see that in this data.
What is the clinical presentation of COVID-19 in pregnancy? Answer: The same as the general population
1/3-1/2 of OB patients with COVID-19 are asymptomatic
How to assess severity of disease in pregnant women? Answer: Oxygen saturation, consideration of comorbidities and close follow-up are key
- Oxygen saturation should be >95% on RA for pregnant women. This is a different standard than for non pregnant COVID patients (>92%). Also consider tachypnea (RR>30bpm).
- Outpatient management is appropriate for pregnant women with COVID-19 with mild symptoms, but women should be monitored (at least once within 1-2 weeks of diagnosis)
- should have home pulse oximeter if possible
- should have easy access to care if needed
- antenatal testing should be done as per standard recommendations
- Inpatient management: pregnant patients with moderate or severe disease (O2 sat <95% on room air, refractory T>39 despite antipyretics) and/or significant comorbidity (e.g. DM, CKD, immunosuppresion) should be managed in the hospital
- See diagrams below from ACOG and SMFM. Top diagram is indications for testing, bottom diagram is for triage in known COVID disease.
What are the maternal and fetal outcomes in COVID-19? Answer: we don't really know.
From case reports, observational studies, and some reviews, there is concern that COVID may be associated with an increase in preterm birth, PPROM, cesarean delivery, and stillbirths. We do know that severe viral illnesses (e.g. influenza) have been associated with these outcomes.
One systematic review found aere possible increase in preterm delivery, including spontaneously and medically indicated preterm birth and c-section in pregnant women with confirmed COVID-19 infections. (Reference: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(20)30190-5/fulltext). A UK study looking at outcomes pre and post pandemic preterm found a higher rates of still births-- the authors speculated that outcomes had more to do with access to care and comorbidities directly related to the virus rather than the virus itself.
Is there vertical transmission of COVID-19? Answer: Probably not.
While there is a theoretical risk of vertical transmission, most studies with significant number of cases have demonstrated no evidence of vertical transmission: looking at placenta, cord blood, amniotic fluid, and NP samples. There are a couple of case reports that call question to this, but the data is very limited. In addition, we have little to no data on the effect of COVID-19 infection on the first and second trimesters of pregnancy.
What is appropriate management of COVID-19 pregnant patients? Answer: Treatment for COVID-19 in pregnant women mirrors treatment of COVID-19 in non-pregnant women with slight modifications
- Remdesivir is considered safe in pregnancy (no known fetal toxicity, recommended by SMFM when indicated)
- Convalescent plasma is considered safe (currently under investigation for benefit)
- Steroids if indicated (NIH recommends for "patients needing oxygen")
- SMFM says maternal mortality benefit likely outweighs risk to fetus.
- Can do dexamethasone 10mg IV/PO as per the RECOVERY trial OR
- Some expert opinion recommending methylprednisolone (see paper for details)(Reference: https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/9000/Corticosteroids_in_the_Management_of_Pregnant.97288.aspx)
- COVID-19 infection is NOT an indication for delivery; mechanical ventilation is NOT an indication for delivery
- For severe disease, risks/benefits should be weighed
- Caution with magnesium sulfate because can increase risks of respiratory compromise (weigh risks/benefits depending on comorbidities)
- Most standard obstetrical management is safe: internal monitors, amniotomy, forceps/vacuum
- Might consider early epidural if symptomatic patient to mitigate risks of gen anesthesia for emergent c-section
- Nitrous oxide: not recommended for PUI/COVID+ patients (because of risk of aerosolization) but nitrous is okay to use in women who test COVID negative.
Does COVID-19 in combination with pregnancy increase risk of VTE? Answer: Yes, probably.
While there are only a few case reports of VTE in COVID in pregnancy, both COVID and pregnancy are hypercoagulable states and separately increase risk of VTE. Thus current recommendations for VTE prophylaxis:
- All pregnant women admitted with COVID-19 should receive enoxaparin unless delivery is anticipated in <12 hours.
- Also all hospitalized pregnant women should be 10 days of VTE prophylaxis after hospital discharge.
How should COVID-19 couplets be managed postpartum?
- Moms with COVID-19 are prone to hypervolemia (keep strict Ins/Outs, watch respiratory status)
- Infants of COVID moms should be bathed after birth
- Breastfeeding should be encouraged!!
- Separation of mother and infant is NOT recommended (likelihood of testing positive is the same if separated or kept together, if precautions maintained)
- infant should be tested once at 24 hours of life (no retest indicated)
- mom should use mask/hand hygiene
- baby should be in isolette when not breastfeeding
What about mental health in COVID in pregnancy? Answer: Ah, so much to say. . .
- Social isolation is associated with increased risk of depression and anxiety. Screen and ask!
- PTSD has been recognized for those who are isolated/quarantined--> be sure to check in with new moms about the impact this may have on their postpartum period
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis (Hamann 7/23/2026)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE . *** Thanks so much to Dr. Kendal Hamann, SMGR Endocrinologist, for an outstanding Gra...
-
A recording of this presentation is available HERE . Many thanks to Dr. Andrew Brown, who gave an excellent Grand Rounds presentation this w...
-
Great thanks to Dr. Jose Maldonado, a Stanford psychiatrist and neuropsychiatrist, who literally wrote the benzodiazepine-sparing alcohol wi...
