Serious Illness Communication (Sanders, 6/2/2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Justin Sanders for a really important Grand Rounds presentation this week on Serious Illness Communication. Dr. Sanders is a family physician, a palliative care specialist and a researcher in Dr. Atul Gawande's think tank, Ariadne Labs. He has a particular interest in disparities and inequities in end of life care.

A recording of his Grand Rounds can be found HERE.

What is serious illness communication, you ask? 

Serious Illness Communication is a framework for how health care providers can engage with patients with advanced illness to elicit their goals and values, share their prognosis, and explore key topics for their end of life care-- all essential components of advanced care planning as well as the physician-patient relationship. 

Dr. Sanders (and the serious illness care model) ask us to proactively identify patients with severe illness so that we can prioritize and systematize important conversations. The goal?  Improved communication with our patients and "goal-concordant care"-- that is, to be sure that the care a patient receives at the end of their life is concordant with the life they want to live.

Take a moment to consider your patient panel, or if that feels overwhelming, take a look at your patient schedule for today and ask yourself this question: which of my patients would I not be surprised if they died in the next year? 

This is called "the surprise question" and has been validated in palliative care studies. Maybe you are thinking about a patient with chronic heart disease, lung disease, cancer, or  maybe one who has been hospitalized several times in the last year; perhaps it's someone with decreasing mobility, or even one that you hear a lot from their caretaker. It may be helpful to extend that time to 1-2 years so you capture as many patients is possible.

Now, the next question: is there a way your system can help plan the time, space, and opportunity to have these important conversations? Maybe an EHR prompt? An extended visit? A dedicated visit?

Once the space is set, the serious illness communication can begin-- guided by the serious illness communication guide (SICG) cut and paste below. 

The work is big: Have you asked them who their surrogate decision-maker should be in their stead? Do they have an Advanced Care Plan? Do they have a POLST? But perhaps more importantly:


 Here are the key SICG questions:

  • What are YOUR goals?
  • What are YOUR fears and worries if your health deteriorates or your illness progresses?
  • What are your strengths?
  • What abilities are important for you in your life?
  • What might you be willing to go through for the sake of more time?
These are such a powerful set of questions-- of course, the very questions I would want someone to ask me if my time was short-- and turns out the very questions patients want to be asked. 

He also spent some time talking about framing prognosis and encouraged us to use a framework for how we present this information. An original viewpoint co-authored in JAMA by Dr. Sanders and colleagues is linked here for your own reading.

The short take is this: prognosis communication is super challenging, many of us struggle with how to provide this type of information in a useful way that doesn't allow for hope. The article argues that prognosis may be communicated in three different approaches: time-based, function-based, and reasonable-uncertainty based. Exploring with a patient for his/her preferences to guide the discussion will help providers give the patient the most useful information.

Time: how much time do you think I Have
Function: what will my function look like
Reasonable uncertainty: remember our goal is not to be right; it's to help patients have the information they need to reach their goals.

And then, finally Dr. Sanders said, you (the provider) should take the information gleaned from this rich conversation with your patient, apply the prognosis information you have, and make a recommendation (patients want a recommendation from you!), using language like this: "I have heard you say_________________and based on what you said, I am going to recommend ________________________."

Voila. Hard stuff. Thanks for the work you do.




Yes, Doctors Can Cry Too: Addressing Physician Grief and Moral Injury (Pedraza, 5/26/2021)

Muchas Gracias to Dr. Ruth Pedraza for an important presentation this week on Physician Grief and Moral Injury. Dr. Pedraza was the chief resident in charge of the inpatient adult medicine service at SSRRH during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in Sonoma County (mid December through mid January of this year). She lead her team with grace.  Please take the time to watch a recording of her wonderful and relevant presentation HERE.

For the readers, here are my notes, but first my personal take home: we health care providers, need to acknowledge that this job is HARD, that the pandemic made a hard job harder, and we all have tons of unprocessed grief that we need to address. It doesn't matter if we are just at the beginning of our career or winding down, or somewhere in between. The weight is real.

As Dr. Pedraza said at the start, "The culture of medicine is so so rushed, and sometimes it can deny us the right to stop, to process, and to grieve. I did not feel prepared to support my team for such a traumatic cycle. I did not know how to honor our patients, I did not know what was appropriate."


Each flame in this image represents a patient death on the Adult Medicine Service during a four week cycle 7, mid Dec 2020-mid Jan 2021 (75% from COVID)

Physician grief

What is grief? An emotional and physical response to a loss. That loss can be death, but other losses can also provoke grief, including a divorce, losing a friend, losing a job. This has been a year of losses. Emotional grief reactions may include anger, guilt, anxiety, sadness, despair. Physical grief reactions may include trouble sleeping, changes in appetite, physical problems, or even illness. Grief and mourning are different, though we often conflate the two; grief is internal, mourning is an external expression (e.g. crying, art, music, prayer, journaling, etc).

How do you grieve? 

Dr. Pedraza reminded us of the 5 stages of grief, outlined by. Dr Elizabeth Kubler Ross (Swiss psychiatrist), based on her work with terminally ill patients (see image below). Initially it was thought that everyone experiences these stages in a linear fashion, but now we know some people may skip some, never experience some, get stuck in certain stages, etc. The truth is that people's responses to grief are very different.


Many physicians witness death in our professional lives, but we have very little training, acknowledgement, and inadequate space in the medical culture to process our own grief appropriately. Physicians experience emotional exhaustion, isolation, shame and guilt. Unprocessed grief leads to trauma. In some ways, our profession punishes doctors for grieving. 

We know that physicians can engage in negative coping mechanisms, which can be dangerous for our patients AND our personal lives and families. These may include alcohol, drugs, even firearms

Do doctors grieve when their patients die? Dr. Pedraza cited a powerful study by Granek et al from Canada, interviewing 20 oncologists varying in age, sex, ethnicity and years of experience. She found that oncologists struggle to manage their feelings of grief with the detachment they felt necessary to do their job. More than half cited feelings of failure, self doubt, sadness and powerlessness. 

She also found that grief in the medical context is considered shameful and unprofessional. Even though doctors wrestle with experience of grief, they often hide their feelings because it is considered professional weakness. The single most consistent finding in these oncologists was the description of compartmentalization with regards to patient loss. 

Compartmentalization is a pretty natural impact of continual loss. Denial, disassociation to describe death of a patient-- leading to unacknowledged grief. Leading to distractedness, inattentiveness, irritability, emotional exhaustion and burnout. They also admitted that this would lead them to provide more aggressive chemo, referral for clinical trial or suggest surgery when actually palliative care would have been a better option for that patient. Also impacting ability to communicate with patients about end of life discussions. Half admitted distancing themselves from dying patients, less overall effort toward the dying patient.

Do you compartmentalize? How does that manifest in your care of patients? What about your care of loved ones?

What is the physician culture about crying and expressing grief? We all express sadness in different ways; there exist generational differences, gender differences, and specialty differences. What about crying in front of patients? Is it acceptable? Is it unprofessional? The prevailing belief in medicine is that physicians should be composed and calm. While it is expected that it may happen, it's expected to occur in a private place. 2009 study noted that 69% of students, 74% of residents self reported crying due to patient losses

viral photo (and words) Southern California ER MD after 19 year old patient died


The truth is that patients desire care from doctors who are connected and feel their emotions deeply.

Have you cried with a patient? How did that go? Have you tried not to cry with a patient? Why?

Moral Injury

Reframing clinical distress. There is an increasing awareness of working in medicine, critical care, and terminal illness

Burnout--a constellation of symptoms (malaise, fatigue, frustration, cynicism inefficacy) that arise from making excessive demands on energy, strength or resources in the workplace-- is an important notion in medicine, and more than half of physicians experience these symptoms. However, many clinicians have resisted this characterization because it doesn't quite encapsulate what many physicians feel. 

In 2018, Drs. Talbot and Dean wrote an article on the Moral injury; it was titled Physicians aren't "burning out". They are suffering from moral injury. You can find that paper here

The notion of moral injury is most often described in Vietnam Vets, returning from a war they didn't believe in. 

Moral injury occurs when we perpetrate, bear witness to, or fail to prevent an act that transgresses our deeply held moral beliefs. In healthcare, this equates to systems issues that prevent us from putting our patients first.This is an oat that is the core of our working lives. As clinicians we are increasingly forced to consider other demands: EHR, documentation, insurance company, hospital administration. Every time we make a decision that conflicts with our patient's best interest, we feel a sting of moral injustice. The cumulative effect is moral injury.

Whereas the treatment for burnout is affirming individual coping skills (e.g. yoga, mindfulness, wellness retreats, and meditation practice); the treatment for moral injury is aligning the system's goals with the physician's goals. It is absurd to believe that yoga will solve the problem of treating patients who cannot get the correct medical care, having 12 minutes to discuss huge life choices with patients. The moral injury of healthcare is being unable to provide high quality care and healing in the face of our system. So many parts of our medical system prevent us from spending time with patients, fear of litigation causes us to overtest and overtreat, patient satisfaction scores can silence physicians from providing necessary (but unwelcome) advice to patients.

Does the notion of moral injury resonate with you? How so?

The COVID Burden and Unanticipated Grief

The pandemic has brought grief to a different level for many of us. 

ICU Physician Perspective. Consider reading  this reflection by Dr. Thanh Naville (UCLA ER physician) titled "I am an ICU Doctor. I am haunted by what I've seen during the recent COVID-19 surge."  She speaks to the notion of how COVID-19 made it impossible to fulfill her own mission statement: help people. How her sense of defeat has been palpable. 

Let's not forget the disproportionate effect of COVID on poor communities and communities of color. This also was palpable this year at SSRRH.

And, lest we forget, the outpatient providers were also impacted tremendously. As quoted one outpatient family physician: "I may not have the acute wound of watching people die of COVID in the hospital, but I have a chronic wound. . the space of holding for death of family members."

What are your wounds from this pandemic? How can you help yourself heal these wounds?

And it's not just health care workers. Our entire communities are grieving loss of jobs, contact, community, travel, etc. We need to grieve as a community. It is okay to cry. Allow ourselves the space to rest and heal.

How can we address Physician Grief?

We may all grieve differently, but grieve we must. For our own good and the good of our patients. Different ideas: death talks, professional grief support, didactic preparation for med students and residents, death rounds (for trainees), personal awareness, writing of clinical obituaries. Many other ways. Each of us must determine most effective personal style for resolving patient loss.

If you need help, here are some resources for physicians, compiled by Dr. Pedraza.



AI in Radiology (Rael, 5/19/21)

Thanks to SMGR Radiologist, Dr. Jesse Rael, for a thought-provoking Grand Rounds titled AI in Radiology this week. Super interesting. 

The recording is available HERE for your viewing pleasure. 

Here are my thoughts on Dr. Rael's presentation: 

facial recognition at airport (cnn.com)

Artificial intelligence is the the theory and development of computer systems able to perform tasks that normally require human intelligence, such as visual perception, speech recognition, decision-making, and translation between languages.

AI is present in many aspects of modern life, including facial ID, social media platforms, google search, digital voice assistants (siri and alexa), smart home devices, amazon recommendations, and more.

The topic of AI feels very far from where we are in the world of safety net primary care-- where literally just getting a patient a follow up appointment with a PCP feels like moving a mountain. But I am not sure my sense is actually accurate. In fact, Dr. Manny Mendoza gave a Grand Rounds just a few months ago on AI in Primary Care. The link to that GR summary and recording is here. And the truth is, AI is already making changes in primary care: decision-making tools, benign vs. malignant lesions in dermatology, chronic disease management and more.

With regards to radiology, AI means a computer that is trained to interpret images to either rule in/out a radiographic diagnosis. This could include a wide range of diagnoses, from fractures to pulmonary emboli to cancer, and beyond.

Proponents of AI in radiology argue that radiologists are expensive, there is increasing expectations of productivity, that imaging is getting more complex, numbers of images per study are increasing, and that AI could streamline and improve that work. 

Dr. Rael doesn't think that computers are going to replace radiologists, BUT, he believes, radiologists who don't adopt the evolving technology will likely be replaced. In his words, AI could be considered equivalent to autopilot in a jet engine cabin-- the pilot is absolutely needed, particularly for complex situations, and the autopilot function is there to help him do his job better. 

Dr. Rael's hope is that AI will help radiologists to become more productive, enhance protocols, be available where radiologists are not, and more. And, as he points out, radiologists do much more than interpret images-- they are involved in clinician-to-clinician and clinician-to-patient communication, QA, education, policy making, hands on scanning, biopsies, etc.

Dr. Rael spent some time helping us to understand the concept of "deep learning" currently being used in image interpretation. He showed us how a computer can "see" images (e.g. a kidney or a brain lesion) on a screen.


There are many different current AI projects around the world: identification of pulmonary edema on CXR, white matter abnormalities in very preterm infants, PE recognition, benign vs. malignant breast lesions, abnormalities in knee MRI, and automatic scan range delimitation in Chest CT. The possibilities are endless! Dr. Rael himself is involved in a neuroradiologic project looking at image analysis for different brain lesions-- what does a glioblastoma look like? How can a computer recognize it?

And what about global health implications for providers working in places where there are not only no radiologists, but no machines to image (e.g. butterfly ultrasound with images being interpreted by offsite AI)? 

What do you think about AI in radiology and AI in general in medicine? Deeply interesting, kind of scary, and definitely cool.

My advice for this week: if you have a question about a radiographic finding, don't forget to call your friendly local radiologist-- I always feel like I understand more about a complex impression, after I have spoken to a real live human radiologist. Will that always be so?




Practical Reproductive Medicine for the Primary Care Provider (Uzelac, 5/12/2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Peter Uzelac, medical director of the Marin Fertility Center, who gave a really great presentation this week on reproductive medicine  for primary care providers. He covered a lot of important topics that are not bread and butter for us, but that are definitely important to understand and consider in caring for patients of reproductive age. Dr. Uzelac also gave us some great insight as to what patients can/are doing themselves and what we can/might recommend.

For those of you who want to see the presentation, a video recording is available HERE.

For my notes, keep reading. . . 

Optimizing Natural Conception: 

  • the "fertile window" is a 6 day interval when conception is possible, ending on the day of ovulation
  • frequency of intercourse recommended for optimal fertility success: q1-2 days in the fertile window (though 2-3 times/week nearly equivalent)
  • there is no substantial evidence that monitoring increases success
    • it turns out that changes in cervical mucus performs as well or better than basal body temperature (BBT) or urinary LH
  • no timing, position, resting around sexual intercourse have any impact on fertility
  • moderate alcohol (1/day) or moderate caffeine (1 cup coffee/day) is probably okay
  • smoking, recreational drugs (including marijuana) are not good

Causes of infertility: 
  • male factor 30% 
  • diminished ovarian reserve 30%
  • ovulatory dysfunction 10%
  • tubal/peritoneal 20%
  • unexplained 10%

When should someone be evaluated for infertility?

In the absence of a remarkable history or physical findings, treatment should be started if no pregnancy results after active attempt for pregnancy within:
    • 12 months for women <35 (85% of couples trying to get pregnant will be successful after 12 months)
    • 6 months for women >35
    • Immediate evaluation and tx for women >40

3 "Tiers" of Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility
  • Tier 1: for all couples; focus on the basics: eggs, uterus/tubs, sperm
  • Tier 2: ~15% of people; more focused, newer diagnostics, less validates (endometriosis, chronic endometritis, molecular sperm assessment, things only seen during ovarian stimulation or embryo culture)
  • Tier 3: difficult/rare cases, after multiple treatment failures (immunomodulation, uterine microbiome) 

What historical clues can help?  
  • Menstrual history:
    • Intervals: 28 days +/- 7 is considered normal
    • abnormal uterine bleeding (structural, hormonal, endometriosis)
    • pain/dysmenorrhea (endometriosis)
  • Duration of infertility: unsurprisingly, the longer the problem, the harder to solve
  • Gs and Ps
  • How many children desired? (start planning with first child--> embryo banking)
What physical clues can help?
  • ultrasound (cysts, polyps, fibroids, adenomyosis)
  • BMI (extremes, upper and lower)
  • androgen excess (especially in oligomenorrhea)
  • Thyroid
How do you know a woman is ovulating? There are many ways to detect, none are perfect
  • Of note, 1-12% of normal women's cycles are anovulatory (more likely in extremes of reproductive age)
  • You can detect ovulation through a variety of methods:
    • mid cycle symptoms: discharge, mittelschmerz
    • moliminal symptoms (fluid, breast tenderness, craving, mood)
    • hormones: LH surge, mid-luteal progesterone (normal is >3ng/ml, drawn one week prior to expected menses rather than on a specific cycle day; levels may vary 7-fold even within hours)
    • Ultrasound: dominant follicle, corpus luteum cysts
What patients may be doing to detect ovulation? Tracking w/apps, diary good start but women get too focused on these, urine ovulation kits (detect both LH surge and estrogen surge as well), wearables, post-ovulatory progesterone kit. All can be used to demonstrate ovulation and time intercourse. 

Pearl: Eumenorrheic patients with sporadic anovulation doesn't impact fertility. They will eventually get pregnant over the 12 month interval! Many women get very focused on this step. Try to have patient focus less on ovulation if they are generally ovulating.

What about ovarian reserve? This is often the most important factor in fertility; age is so impactful on chances for successful pregnancy. Plus, fertility doctors can fix almost anything EXCEPT ovarian reserve
  • all eggs a woman will ever have are present at birth
  • apoptosis occurs through a woman's lifetime
    • egg survival falls more around age 35/37, fertility ends early 40s, but menopause doesn't happen until closer to 50
  • for a woman's last 10 years, she often has  regular periods but not able to get pregnant
    • last child statistically  is age 42, pregnancy is possible but not probable after 43


Ovarian reserve testing: REI no longer use FSH/E2 (not sensitive enough), or provocative tests, really test of choice is anti Mullerian hormone (AMH)
  • AMH is more sensitive than FSH (can be done on OCPs, needs to be adjusted by 30%). 
  • A follow-up test: antral follicle count (on ultrasound)
Of note, these markers are poor predictors of fecundability , they mostlyt help to characterize where a patient is on their fertility timeline, not really a great test to predict pregnancy. REI uses them to predict response to stimulation in IVF

What patients are doing? At home "hormone testing" not well validated, often include hormones not assessed at the same time as other hormones, so not great. Would NOT recommend.

Fertility ultrasound (Antral follicle):

What you are looking for on ultrasound:
  • early resting follicles 2-10mm
  • dominant follicle 20-28mm prior to ovulation
  • corpus luteum cyst left behind right after ovulation

Uterus/tubes:
  • For tubes: hysterosalpingogram (HSG): proximal and distal tube occlusion, adhesions, etc
    • not great for uterine cavity visualization, cannot differentiate septate from bicornuate uterus
    • bilateral FILL and SPILL, delays in fill/spill, obstruction (proximal vs. distal), hydrosalpinx
  • For uterus: saline sonogram (hysterosonography) defines size and shape of uterine cavity (91% sensitivity, 84% spec for intrauterine pathology: polyps, myomas, synechiae)
  • hysteroscopy is not typically done unless plan for intervention (e.g. ablate septum, polypectomy)
Male factor:
  • history: prior fertility, erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction, anabolic steroid use (testosterone, previous abdominal or scrotal surgery, STD
  • semen analysis: concentration, motility, morphology
  • see WHO guidelines below for normal values
  • results are a SPECTRUM: more abnormal parameters, the higher increase in fertility problems
  • only a spot check, lots of fluctuations (should be repeated if abnormal)
What are patients doing? Home semen analysis is available: 
  • Yo test ($50)
  • Fellow: send in kit, conventional semen analysis  ($170)

Tier 2 conditions to consider:
  • Endometriosis, underdiagnosed, classically a surgical diagnosis, now fertility doctors using specialty markers
  • Chronic endometritis
  • Microbiome

Reproductive Therapeutics 
"Simple fixes"
  •  Polypectomy, ovulation induction in PCOS, IUI for mild male factor, etc
Superovulation and Intrauterine insemination (IUI) for women <37
  • Clomid or letrozole x 5 days
  • IUI (with sperm washing)
*NEW guidelines 2020: Immediate IVF should be offered in women >38 years of age

Is the answer always syphilis? (Le, 2021)

Thanks to Dr. Jimmy Le for an excellent Grand Rounds presentation this week on Syphilis. Rates of syphilis have been on the rise in the US and in Sonoma County for the last decade.

A recording of his excellent presentation is available HERE.
For those of you who want the notes, here are my notes:

Epidemiology:
  • Before 2013, cases of syphilis in the US were generally concentrated in men who have sex with men (MSM) 
  • From 2013-2018, there has been increase of 170% primary and secondary syphilis diagnosis in women AND rising rates in black/Latinx populations
  • There is a high rate of co-infection w/HIV (42% MSM with syphilis also have HIV)
  • In 2019, 129K cases of syphilis in the US (MSM and MSMW), 1870 cases reported of congenital syphilis (unfortunately more common in BIPOC mothers)
  • In SoCo, as well, rates have been increasing, similarly transitioning from primarily a disease in MSM to a wider category of folks, including more women, homeless, persons who inject drugs
What is syphilis?
  • A spirochete infection caused by treponema pallidum
  • Multiple stages of syphilis can be confusing (see graphic below from Emory)
  • The incubation period 9 days-3 months (can be asymptomatic)
  • Neurosyphilis, ocular syphilis and otic syphilis can happen at ANY time during infection (should have low threshold to test for these)

Primary syphilis: 3-90 days after exposure, painless chancre, round and firm, can appear anywhere, generally 3 weeks after infection, heal on own in days/weeks, place where chancre appears is where exposure occurred (e.g. anus, vagina, penis). Gets missed, people don't notice because it doesn't hurt!
Secondary syphilis: 3-6 months after initial infection: "bigger rashes", more widespread (hands, feet, trunk, tongue, hair loss)
Tertiary syphilis: years to decades after exposure, "the great imitator", can show up in any tissues: cardiovascular, skin, bone, etc

Early latent: asymptomatic, <12 months of exposure
Late latent: asymptomatic  infection >12 months of exposure, "syphilis of unknown duration"

Neurosyphilis: CNS infection (meningitis), general paresis, tabes dorsalis
Ocular syphilis: vision loss, blurry vision, eye pain, redness
Otic syphilis: sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo

Transmission:
  • Primary syphilis is VERY transmittable (lots of treponemes in primary chancres-- any surface is vulnerable), likelihood of transmission is ~30%
  • As you move through stages, you become less and less infectious, can definitely still transmit but less than primary
  • Syphilis is also one of TORCHES infections, the spirochete crosses the placenta very readily
Diagnosis:
  • Two types of tests:
    • Non-treponemal test: tests for cardiolipin cholesterol-lecithin antigen (RPR, VDRL), always presented as titers
    • Treponemal test: detection of Ab against Ag. once positive, will always test positive (FTA-ABS, TPPA)
  • Two methods for testing, decision which algorithm to use is based on prevalence. Generally thought higher prevalence area should use reverse testing algorithm 
    • Traditional (see image) starts with RPR, reflex to TPPA confirmation
    • Reverse (see image), do the opposite (start with TPPA), if that tests positive, reflexes to RPR)
  • Once a patient is positive, Treponemal tests will ALWAYS be positive, so you always need RPR and titers
  • Do note, you can have false negative RPR in latent period and upon appearance of chancre 1-3 weeks (e.g. if you are testing "too early", if you see a chancre, treat treat treat)
  • Dx of neurosyphilis requires high clinical suspicion and low threshold for doing LP and getting CSF: test for protein, WBC, CSF-VDRL (which has poor sensitivity, 70% can test negative)



Treatment

Penicillin is ALWAYS the treatment
(see chart above for details)
  • Don't forget to get an RPR on the day of treatment (to get baseline)
  • If a patient reports contact with anyone with syphilis in the last 90 days, treat empirically! 
    • including partner treatment!
    • www.dontspreadit.com (anonymous texting about exposure)
  • Primary, secondary, early latent (<12 months): PCN 2.4 million units IMx 1
  • Late latent (>12 months), unknown duration of tertiary with normal CSF: need to be treated with IM injections x 3 (one week apart)
  • Neuro/ocular/otic syphilis: treatment is IV PCN 10-14 days (usually initial hospitalization)
  • If a patient has PCN allergy, desensitization and treatment with PCN is still recommended (JAMA article on PCN desensitization available HERE)
  • Follow-up testing is KEY: 
    • for primary/secondary, early latent, retest with RPR at 6, 12 month (looking for 4x decrease in titer)
    • for late latent, unknown, you should retest at 6, 12, and 24 months
    • RPR baseline will be your guideline to determine if someone has been reinfected (4x increase demonstrates reinfection)
Questions about staging/treatment, can always call: Team Vida 707-583-8823 or SoCo Health Department 707-565-4566

Congenital Syphilis:
  • complex diagnosis and treatment algorithms (see diagram from California DPH below)
  • steady rise of congenital syphilis since 2012, 400% increase since 2012
  • syphilis readily crosses placenta or via contact with chancre during delivery
  • can affect ALL organs of the body, can lead to infant death and miscarriage
  • wide clinical presentation: < 2 year old, usually presents by 5w-3 months of age, 60-90% will be symptomatic
    • sx include hepatomegaly, jaundice, rhinitis ("snuffles"=white discharge, more severe than common cold, mucous discharge VERY infectious because lots of treponemes in them), rash, generalized LAD, skeletal abnormalities
  • Treatment: IV PCN 50K units/kg q8 hours x 1 week, then q12 hours OR PCM IM x daily x 10 days
  • Evaluation: neurodevelopmental, hearing, eye, serologic testing with RPR until negative or 4x decrease (usually non-reactive by 6 months)
https://californiaptc.com/in-the-news/new-tool-for-clinicians-unveiled-to-ensure-appropriate-treatment-of-congenital-syphilis/

Screen for STIs!
Screen all sexually active patients for HIV, RPR, GC/CT (including swabbing every site they use to have sex, including mouth, vagina, rectal)
Other STIs predict HIV risk (see infographic)
Offer partner treatment always

https://californiaptc.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Slide7.jpg



Vomiting in Children (Mueller, 4/21/2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Claudia Mueller, Stanford and CPMC pediatric surgeon, for an excellent presentation on Vomiting in Children-- her lens, unsurprisingly, was on the surgical causes of vomiting in children. 

As a family medicine physician, I don't typically consider vomiting in children a "surgical" problem, but it was sure a good reminder that sometimes it is! It's a hearty crew of clinicians who want to assemble at 7:30am to talk about vomit-- but hey-I have to tell you-- her presentation was excellent!  AND the best part was that Dr. Mueller gave us a number to call if we ever run into problems. 

To watch Dr. Mueller's excellent presentation click HERE.

For the Cliff's notes version, here you go:

  • Surgical causes of vomiting in children can rapidly progress to be life threatening
    • Ask yourself How sick is this kid? Do they have fever, tachycardia, moist music membranes, lethargy? Can I get them to stand for the KUB?
  • Presence of vomiting and ABSENCE of diarrhea is a concerning sign 
    • This makes sense; most vomiting in kids is related to acute viral gastroenteritis or food poisoning, both of which should be accompanied by diarrhea. The absence of diarrhea is a sign that surgical causes of vomiting should be on your ddx
  • The color of the vomit is key: color gives you some indication of the level the vomit is coming from (I know, I know, who wants to talk about the color of vomit) 
    • this is particularly true in infants
      • yellow/green (bilious) emesis in children <1 year is an "alarm bell that should be rung through the streets of any city" as it could be a surgical emergency (cardinal hallmark of a midgut volvulus that you do NOT want to miss)
    • most children will vomit food and other particulate matter, if they vomit long enough, they will eventually vomit bile, so prolonged vomiting leading to bilious vomiting may be less concerning than it starting out bilious
  • The intestine is a tube: in addition to the color of the vomit, what is coming out the bottom gives us a lot of information. If a child is having something out the bottom, they are much less likely to have true obstruction
    • Passing gas is best indication (more even than bowel movements)
SBO
  • Previous abdominal surgery is #1 cause of of adhesions causing SBO in children
    • traumatic surgeries (e.g. trauma ex-lap) are more likely to lead to adhesions
    • laparoscopic surgery maybe less risky (eg. laparoscopic appy) 
  • Farting is a good sign-- air doesn't just hang out in the colon; a child that is passing gas, even if there is an obstruction, it is at least partial
  • Be aware: not all kids with SBO get abdominal distention
  • An UPRIGHT KUB is the imaging modality of choice to evaluate for SBO in a child
    • want to be able to visualize: diaphragm, rectal gas
    • UPRIGHT is super important: air goes to top, liquid down to the bottom
      • air-fluid levels (straight lines) in SBO (can see in ileus, but more common in SBO)
      • a sick child who cannot stand up for KUB is concerning
    • CT scans can show more detail, e.g. the "point of the obstruction" but generally try to avoid CT scans in children <10 due to radiation
      • if you do CT scan, should do IV contrast; used to always require oral contrast (and can be more helpful), but should be done carefully due to risk of aspiration 

Upright KUB showing SBO
  • Initial treatment: NGT for decompression 
    • NGT should be adequate size (if it's too small, won't work as well). An NGT an actually treat SBO by relieving the pressure
      • Babies, size 10-12
      • Toddlers, size 12-14
      • age >7 years, size 14
      • teenagers/adults, minimum size 14, better >16
  • NGT has to be flushed, or it will get clogged
  • If NGT is working, as evidenced by the amount coming out of NGT decreases, and child starts feeling better, you may be able to avoid surgery
  • Another option after NGT: small bowel follow-through with gastrograffin (or ominpaque) can be diagnostic AND therapeutic
    • 25-50cc, repeat KUB 6-12 hours after administration: decreases hospital stay either because quicker to OR vs. able to discharge home
  • Hydration and serial abdominal exams are important in SBO
Midgut volvulus is the most urgent cause of bilious vomiting, usually in children <1 year old (85% before 6 months, 95% before 1 year)
  • A true emergency is caused because mesenteric vein and artery get twisted, no blood flow to the entire small bowel (colon and first/second part of duodenum have their own blood supply)
  • Can be life threatening in a few hours
  • Perfectly healthy baby totally fine, suddenly starts throwing up yellow/green, call a surgeon!
  • Imaging: UGI shows cutoff; x-ray may show just a stomach bubble (no other gas)
  • Consequence so dire: lose entire small intestine, may never be able to survive not on TPN

Pyloric Stenosis typically thickening/hypertrophy of pyloric muscle fibers
  • No one know why it happens
  • Usually age 2 weeks to 2 months, classically first-born males
  • Non-bilious (breastmilk or formula), progressive and persistent
  • Imaging: ultrasound
  • Surgery: cut open hypertrophic fibers, outer layer and spread it (pyloromyotomy)
  • Typically does not recur
Appendicitis
  • n/v, abdominal pain, umbilical down to RLQ
  • renewed interest in conservative management with antibiotics only
    • 95% of cases can be treated with antibiotics only, but 20% will recur in 1 year, 30% in 5 years
    • fecolith has VERY high recurrence, should be operated lap appendectomy
Ileocolic intussusception
  • generally age 6-36 months
  • small part of small intestine gets stuck in large intestine
  • usually due to laxity, lead point usually a lymph node, can be seen after enteritis OR after immunization (e.g. rotavirus vaccine)
  • Imaging: ultrasound, "target sign"
  • Reduction via radiology (air or contrast from anus into rectum, pushes the intussusception , reduces the small intestine), works large majority of time in kids without ischemia
    • 10% recurrence rate-->  to OR
  • Older kids need work up, lead point (e.g. lymphoma)
Hernias
  • bilious vomiting, if incarcerated
  • remember to take off vomiting baby's diaper to look for non-reduceable hernia

Dental Care for Primary Care (Gonzalez, 4/14/2021)

Great thanks and Happy Birthday to our Grand Rounds speaker this week, Gina Gonzalez, DDS for a comprehensive review of what primary care doctors should know about dental care: Oral Health for the Primary Care Provider. Dr. Gonzalez took us from the cradle to the grave (or crib to casket, so to speak) and motivated me to schedule a dental preventive visit ASAP! 

She reminded us that the mouth is an important part of the body, and when medical providers are seeing patients, we should definitely be examining their mouths, giving them preventive dental care recommendations, and screening for oral cancers. 

For those of you who missed it, a link to the video recording can be found HERE. For those of you who prefer the summary, here are my summary notes:

Tooth decay and periodontal disease are 100% preventable

  • 92% of US adult have dental disease, 50% have gum disease, 5% of adults are edentulous
  • 42% of US children have early childhood cavities (i.e. in baby teeth)
  • Fluoride reduced decay by 50%

Pediatrics:

Prevention

  • Cavities are an infectious disease! Strep mutans is the oral bacteria transmitted from adults' mouths to babies' mouths Pro tip: don't kiss babies on the mouth (you'll give them your bacteria)
  • A baby's first visit to the dentist should be as soon as baby has its first tooth (parental education: how to care for the mouth, fluoride-- remember, in Sonoma County, we don't have fluoridated water, so parents need to use fluoride supplement or a fluoride containing toothpaste)
  • To get a good look in a baby's mouth during your exam, try doing a knee-to-knee exam (see photo), in which the baby straddles parent and head is in examiner's lap 
    knee to knee dental exam position

  • Kids should NOT use toothpaste unless they know to spit OR parents can put about 1/4 size of pea (can wipe away, is not harmful)
  • Breastmilk (and formula ) both have a lot of carbs--> don't forget to wipe down baby's mouth after they feed
  • Fruits and veggies that contain fluoride include: grapes, spinach, oatmeal and carrots
  • Brush baby's teeth every day!
  • Early childhood caries can be prevented: no fall asleep after nursing/bottle without wiping the teeth, only water in the bottle, clean
  • No soda!

Pathology

  • Rarely, infants are born with a neonatal tooth (often rudimentary root), which be easily extracted, particularly if they are making problems with breastfeeding
  • Silver diamide fluoride is treatment for ECC (it may be ugly but STOPS the decay and avoids general anesthesia, capping, etc.)
  • When a child is getting their adult teeth, two rows of teeth is normal, usually teeth come out on the own, don't worry!
  • If a child's tooth comes out due to trauma, put the tooth back in child's mouth while you seek care; if you are worried they cannot safely do so, put the tooth in your own mouth (saliva is good for preserving the root). A third choice is to put it in milk (not water, which is dehydrating)
  • In children, purulent abscess can form due to trauma or decay; if you see one, they critically need treatment 
Adults

Prevention
  • Advise adults to floss their teeth before they brush: fluoride goes into cleaner space
  • Power brushes can remove more plaque than traditional toothbrush
  • Tongue hygiene brush is a good idea
  • Drink water that is similar to pH of saliva (6.-7.6), bubbly water is acidic, saliva lubricates and bathes your teeth
Pathology
  • Tooth decay is a result of poor hygiene, poor diet, genetics, prescription medications (e.g. SSRI, BP meds can cause a lot of dry mouth, leading to cervical decay--> add fluoride, brushing)
  • soda is bad! 46gm sugar, very low pH
  • Periodontitis is irreversible gum disease; it requires urgent and imperative tooth care
  • As teeth decay and become abscess, infection can go through the bone, full of pus, hard to numb 
  • As patients age, elders tend to drop out of routine care (transportation); don't forget to talk about how they are accessing dental care at well check visits
  • Edentulism is a travesty! When teeth removed, you lose proprioception, start chewing funny, lose pressure to eat, get jaw collapse--> poor appetite, failure to thrive. Dental implants (with dentures attached) are superior!

Oral cancer screening is important and quick!
  • grab a gauze, pull the tongue out!
    • All you need: 2x2 gauze, tongue depressor and flashlight
  • high risk locations for oral cancer: floor of the mouth, lateral borders of the tongue, junction of the hard and soft palate, and posterior oropharynx
  • to do a cancer exam:
    • look at skin of face, scaling, irregular and dark changes, particular attention to ear
    • palpate back of neck, clavicular nodes, SCM, submandibular and sublingual glands
    • eyes: Movement, melanoma, sclera
    • look in nose
    • look at vermillion border of mouth
    • palpate bimanually to feel for anything fixed, parotid gland (tenderness occlusion), check joints (pops/clicks, jaw deviation)
    • lateral border of tongue, floor of mouth, symmetry, gums/bones/teeth
    • palpate inside mouth, junction of hard/soft palate
    • look for symmetry!
    • can be done in 3 minutes!
  • oral cancer risks: tobacco, alcohol, vaping
Okay, now for a quiz: are these oral lesions benign or cancerous? Name these abnormalies (answers below)

A.

B.

C. 

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

J.

K.

A. black hairy tongue (benign) B. oral lichen planus C. Pyogenic granulomas (aka "pregnancy tumors") (benign) D. fordyce granules (benign) E. Geographic tongue (benign) F. Labial HSV G. Oral HPV H. Squamous cell cancer I. Squamous cell cancer  J. verrucous carcinoma K. precancerous lesion from snuff


Human Trafficking (Lisa Fatu, 4/7/2021)

Thanks to Lisa Fatu, director of Youth Crisis Services at Social Advocates for Youth (SAY), who spoke to us this week about Human Trafficking. A video recording of her presentation is available HERE

Human trafficking is the use of force, fraud or coercion to obtain some type of labor or commercial sex act; it is a multi-billion dollar international industry. Human trafficking can occur in any industry, including agriculture, construction, domestic service (housekeeper, nanny), restaurants, salons, commercial sex work, massage parlors, and small businesses. 

Between 2011 and 2018, the Sonoma County District Attorney pursued over 200 cases of human trafficking-- it is certain that many more were events were not reported. SAY provides crisis intervention, food, shelter, trauma-informed counseling, and much more. 

Lisa's goal for Grand Rounds was to teach health care providers how to keep our eyes out for victims of human trafficking-- recognizing that health care settings may be the only outside place where victims are allowed to be seen by their perpetrators. 

Things to look out for that may be indicative of a human trafficking situation:

  • 80% of people trafficked are under 23 years old; average age 14
  • Most victims are women, but men can also be trafficked
  • Be suspicious if you see a young person with another female/male companion who is doing all the talking
  • A trafficking victim may have their head down, make poor eye contact, make minimal interaction
  • They may not know there address or have a PO Box (many traffickers take victims to clinics away from their home)
  • They may not agree to be seen alone, don't want to be left in a room alone
  • They may have bruises, burn markings, small cuts on the inner arm/feet (not generally visible without a full exam)
  • They may have "branding tattoos" (e.g. behind ear, on neck)
  • A victim may be coming only for a vaginal exam, but merit further questioning e.g. "Are you eating?"
  • Victims may be particularly scare of needles
Lisa acknowledged that many of these "red flags" have overlap with insecure youth, youth who are inflicting their own self harm, a young person with poor self esteem, mail away brides, etc. Providers must use your judgement if you suspect the situation is not right, and take the next steps.

Things to consider:
  • Educate your front desk employees (they are most likely to see who a patient arrives with, notice that they do not know their address, act oddly, etc)
  • Always ask for a few moments alone with the patient, have their companion leave the room
  • Consider having the patient leave a urine sample so you can see the patient away from the people that accompany him/her
  • Have a game plan if you identify someone who you think is being trafficked
  • Make relationships with local law enforcement (SRPD, SoCo sheriff's)
  • Always make a follow-up appointment to give victim another chance to be offered services
  • Consider having "nail cards" that have fake nail ad on them but actually have a phone # where help can be available
Aftercare

Unfortunately, 40% of human trafficking victims will return to their trafficker without intense intervention. Victims need therapy, safe living situations, wraparound services, money (they are used to having things paid for) and family education/services (consistency, monitoring relationships, internet activity, clothing)

Did you know SoCo has a multidisciplinary Human Trafficking Task Force?

For more information, contact lisa at: 707-546-3432 or lfatu@saysc.org
Or see SAY's website: https://www.saysc.org/

Nursing leadership at Sutter Santa Rosa Regional Hospital are currently working on a program to educate employees on Human Trafficking in our community. Let me know if you have questions/ideas. Thanks!


What a Pain! Tales of Adult Arthritides (Ramirez, 3/31/2021)

Thank you to Dr. Vanessa Ramirez for her review of two very important inflammatory arthritides at Grand Rounds this week: psoriatic arthritis and gout.  I gleaned so many important pearls from her presentation. For those of you interested in seeing the full recording, it is available here. My summary notes are below:

Inflammatory arthritides

  • infectious (septic)
  • crystal induced (gout, pseudogout)
  • immune related (RA, SLE, psoriatic arthritis, dermatomyositis, Sjogren's)
  • reactive
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) 

  • PsA affects about 20% of people with psoriasis 
    • skin changes can precede arthritis sx for years-- even up to 12 years
    • skin changes and PsA flares are not necessarily temporally related, nor is disease severity necessarily correlated
  • typically asymmetric arthritis (in one, several or multiple joints), sacroiliitis (30-78%) 
  • historic definition of PsA: serological negative (i.e. negative rheumatoid factor) polyarticular arthritis in someone with psoriasis skin manifestations
  • classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) (2006) may be helpful in making this clinical diagnosis (see image below)
  • early identification and treatment prevents joint destruction
  • anti-CCP may be elevated (usually mild) in 12% of patients with PsA
    • more likely in higher numbers of involved joints
  • Risk factors for PsA
    • scalp psoriasis 4x risk, intergluteal/perianal 2.3x risk, nail involvement
    • earlier age at dx with psoriasis, >3 body sites affected, family hx of PsA (first degree)
  • ESR is superior to CRP as a marker of damage progression and mortality
  • Treatment for PSA includes lifestyle modification (diet, smoking cessation, exercise), followed by symptomatic treatments (NSAID, steroids, injections) and then TNF alphas
    • see images below from the 2018 ACR Guidelines
    • also see AAFP image, which includes cost of these treatments

2018 ACR Guidelines for Treatment of PsA
https://www.rheumatology.org/Portals/0/Files/PsA-Guideline-2018.pdf
https://www.rheumatology.org/Portals/0/Files/PsA-Guideline-2018.pdf

AAFP Psoriasis (Am Family Physician 2013)
https://www.aafp.org/afp/2013/0501/p626.html

Gout 
  • Gout is caused by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in the joint space, periarticular structures and soft tissues
    • associated with obesity, htn, hyperlipidemia, DM, CKD, heart failure, thiazide diuretic 
  • ACR online tool Clinical prediction (see image)
  • https://www.aafp.org/afp/2020/1101/p533.html


  • Treatment Acute
    • 2020 ACR Guidelines for Treatment of Gout Flare
      • Naproxen 500 mg BID OR indomethacin 50 mg TID, ibuprofen 800mg TID
      • Colchicine (low dose) 1.2mg PO, then 0.6mg 1 hour later, then BID until flare resolves
      • Oral prednisone 0.5mg/kg (5-10 days full dose then stop OR 2-5 days full dose and then taper over 7-10 days)
  • Treatment Chronic
    • all patients with tophi, radiographic evidence or damage or 2+ flares/year
    • goal is symptom relief AND maintenance of urate levels (<6)
      • we should be titrating allopurinol based on checking uric acid levels
    • Allopurinol is treatment of choice, lower doses preferred to start
    • if on thiazide for BP, switch to losartan



Ecology and the Physician: Therapeutic Considerations for your Patients AND the Environment (Bacon, Fetke 3/24/2021)

Many thanks to Drs. Bacon and Fetke for their presentation. 
A recording of their presentation can be found here: https://youtu.be/gtypRTzS2e8 
A written summary will be added later this week.

Radiology Potpourri (Kujala, 3/17/2021)

Many thanks to Dr. Nick Kujala, Sutter Radiologist and mid-West Scrubs and hockey fan, who gave an entertaining and informative presentation this week, covering a range of topics in radiology: from the history of the first radiograph to the risk of radiation exposure to the invention of the CT scanner. The video recording is available HERE.

Here are a few summary points from his presentation:

1) Radiation Exposure: Many patients (and clinicians) have concerns about the risks of radiation exposure with imaging studies. It may be helpful to note that living on earth gives us daily background radiation exposure, and certain jobs/situations (e.g. working as flight attendant or pilot) increase the amount of that exposure over time. Of note,  exposure from one chest x-ray is the equivalent of  ~10 days of background radiation, whereas at CT of the chest is equivalent to ~2 years. 

Information on radiation exposure for patients is available at this website:  https://www.radiologyinfo.org/en/info.cfm?pg=safety-xray

Also, remember that MRI and ultrasound are alternative imaging modalities that offer ZERO radiation exposure.


2) Breastfeeding and contrast: Women who are breastfeeding can safely receive contrast (iodinated and gadolinium-based) for imaging studies without concern. The dose absorbed by an infant is exceedingly low. There is no need to pump and dump, but ultimately the decision should be left to the lactating mother.

3) ACR Appropriateness Criteria: The American College of Radiology (ACR) has an excellent, information-packed website to help clinicians make the correct choice about imaging studies. Everything you want to know about radiology imaging (indications, risks/benefits, radiation exposure, alternatives) can be found here: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/ACR-Appropriateness-Criteria

An excerpted example of these ACR criteria for abnormal uterine bleeding is pictured below.



4) MRI and Gadolinium: Gadolinium has been used as contrast in MRI for over 30 years. There is a known phenomenon of gadolinium deposition in some tissues (bone, kidney, brain); however, there has been no consistent evidence to suggest that these deposits are associated with neurotoxicity. However, as recent as 2016, some scientists have suggested a condition called Gadolinium Deposition Disease, linking these deposits with a constellation of neurological symptoms and signs.  While Dr. Kujala and the ACR  support the safety profile of gadolinium, it is not recommended during pregnancy

5) More IS Better! Give your radiologist as MUCH clinical information as possible when ordering an imaging study-- you will get more clear results back. And if you have a question, call your local radiologist sitting in his dark reading room (or at home) at x-44551.

Extras:

Roentgen's first ever radiograph of his wife's hand (1895) 



Hounsfield's invention: the CT Scanner (he shared the 1979 Nobel Prize in Medicine)


And finally, what is an Aunt Minnie? The origins of the term "Aunt Minnie" are a bit hazy, but it's believed to have been coined in the 1940s by Dr. Ben Felson, a radiologist at the University of Cincinnati. He used it to describe "a case with radiologic findings so specific and compelling that no realistic differential diagnosis exists."



Can you name the Aunt Minnie below?


Answer: Tension Pneumothorax


Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis (Hamann 7/23/2026)

 A recording of this presentation is available HERE .  *** Thanks so much to Dr. Kendal Hamann, SMGR Endocrinologist, for an outstanding Gra...