A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Sponsored by the Santa Rosa Family Medicine Residency and Sutter Medical Group of the Redwoods
Kratom and 7OH (Dembar & Rubin, 8/12/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Thanks so much to our Addiction Medicine Fellows, Drs. Allie Dembar and Rebecca Rubin for a super super important presentation on Kratom and 7OH, two opioid like substances with high dependence risk and rising rates, despite a 2026 California ban on sale of such products.
Please watch their presentation if you don't know what 7OH is and/or if you work in primary care, emergency rooms, with children, etc. . .
Here are my notes:
Kratom is a plant from Southeast Asia, formal name, mitragyna speciosa. The active ingredient, mitragynine, has a mild stimulant effect when the leaves are chewed (think coca leaves from S. America) as well as a mild opioid effect at higher concentrations.
7OH is a synthetic version of mitragynine, which is much more potent (and only present in <2% of the plant substance). It appeared in the US market ~2024. Some studies suggest higher potency than morphine
Both have been available for sale across the US, mostly in gas stations and smoke shops and until recently were not regulated. In 2026, Governor Newsom announced a ban in California of their sale (though they can still be found in local smoke shops per reliable reports).
The increase in Kratom/7OH availability has led to an increase in kratom toxicities. By 1200%!
There have been 233 Kratom-associated deaths between 2015 and 2025, 79% included multiple substances, and opioids are often co-reported
Functional Disorders, Somatic Symptoms and Chronic Pain (Jones, 8/5/2026)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE
Thanks to Dr. Kendall Jones for a fantastic opener for R3/Senior Grand Rounds presentation this week. She borrowed from a lecture she attended last spring at the Family Medicine Colloquium by Kaiser Family Medicine teachers. . .but really brought it home to our patient population.
If you are a primary care clinician caring for patients with functional disorders (think IBS, migraine, fibromyalgia. . .and all those unn-nameable conditions), you should watch this!
Functional Disorders
Medical school trains us well to investigate mechanical/structural abnormalities (e.g. SBO, carotid stenosis, hip fracture), assess for biochemical abnormalities (e.g. low hb, elevated a1c, hyperthyroidism), but does not prepare us for functional disorders-- which, by definition, have no specific tests. Functional disorders are diagnosed with symptom assessments, validated tools, in combination with negativing imaging/labs or other work-up.
And yet, in primary care, we see a LARGE number of patients with functional disorders. Here are a few:
These patients are challenging. They bring up a lot in clinicians, and they don't always get the care they need. Sometimes they are left to steer their own ship (which doesn't reliably make them better), they get HUGE work ups (all of which turn out negative or equivocal), and they get labels that do not really apply, labels that are hard to remove.
Dr. Jones reminded us that we use clinical judgement all the time to make diagnoses-- think a viral URI or a migraine. For these patients, we use illness scripts and confidence in our experience. This same notion applies to patients with functional disorders.
Central Sensitization
Central sensitization is a state of persistent CNS hyper excitability in which the brain and spinal cord amplify incoming signals beyond their objective magnitude. The "volume of the nervous system" is literally turned up. This is not psychological. It is driven by neuroinflammation, HPA axis dysregulation, synaptic plasticity in the dorsal horn, reduced descending inhibition, and more. This phenomenon is propagated via ACEs, chronic stress, trauma, perception, expectation, and neuroplasticity.
I LOVE this fire alarm analogy!
Reminder: our job is NOT to keep searching for a fire.We need to be able to recognize patterns of central sensitization:
- multi-system symptoms with no unifying biomedical lesion (though don't forget connective tissue and EDS)
- severity out of proportion to objective findings-- the gap is the signal amplification
- symptoms fluctuate with stress, sleep
- prior extensive negative work up but patient remains symptomatic
- presence of ACEs or chronic stress (which patient may not have insight into)
- hypervigilance: symptom tracking, googling, frequent visits, lots of messages
- sensory hypersensitivity: light, sound, temperature, touch, odors (more than just pain)
When tests come back negative, avoid "everything is fine", "your tests are normal", "nothing is wrong", "maybe you're stressed". These statements do not explain what IS happening for the patient and leave them searching for another explanation.
Communication is key!
Somatic Symptom Scale - 8. Gierk B et al. JAMA Intern Med. 2014.
Eight items rated 0-4 over the past 7 days (GI, back pain, limb/joint pain, HA, CP/SOB, dizziness, fatigue, sleep)
8-11 = medium, 12-15 = high, 16-32 = very high.
Each category increase is associated with 53% more healthcare visits
CSI: Central Sensitization Inventory. Mayer TG et al. Pain Pract. 2012; Neblett R et al. J Pain. 2013
Part A: 25 items, scored 0-100
Part B: Prior CSS diagnoses (unscored, clinical context)
Cutoff ≥ 40: 81% sensitivity, 75% specificity for CS syndromes
<30 = subclinical, 30-39 = mild, 40-49 = moderate, 50-59 = severe
Treatment of Central sensitization:
Education: normalize, reframe: "Your symptoms make sense to me. Let's try to understand what is going on." Discuss the context/ask the question: "What do you think is making your nervous system so sensitive?" Help change their relationship with their symptoms-- to decrease their fear. Remember, having somatic symptoms is part of living inside a body.
Nervous system retraining: mindfulness based pain reduction, breathing exercises, cold exposure (resets the mamalian dive reflex), singing, humming, yoga, meditation, massage (feet and neck)
Central sensitization and Chronic pain
- nociplastic pain happens over months to year; it can be at least partially reversed with desensitization of the oversensitized alarm
- patients have to be patient (months to years) to notice improvement
- patients and physicians benefit from moving away from "symptoms" into acceptance, understanding an rehabilitation>> goal is improving quality of life and increasing function
- movement is key: motion is lotion
Mohabbat AB & Wilkinson J (2023). Central sensitization: when it is not all in your head. Am Fam Physician. 101 (1):92-96
G. Lorimer Moseley & D Butler (2017). Explain pain supercharged: the clinician’s manual.
tamethebeast.org (refer patients with chronic pain to this website)
Van Oosterwick J et al. (2013). Pain physiology education improves health status in fibromyalgia. Clin J Pain. 29(10):873-82.
Difficult (aka Dysregulated) Patient Encounters (Pimental, 7/29/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE
***
Thanks to Dr. Britni Pimental, who gave us a fantastic presentation on Difficult Patient Encounters. She started by changing our word choice from "difficult" to "dysregulated". When we label patients as difficult (angry, demanding, emotionally intense), we should be really calling them dysregulated-- shifting this label can help us shift in how we see patients.
There were SO many pearls in this presentation, I definitely recommend listening to it yourself. But for the notes version:
It's not surprising that patients being seen in the clinic or hospital are dysregulated-- their nervous system is literally being stressed-- they are scared, in pain, feeling a loss of control, triggering old trauma and sensing systemic pressures.
When people get overwhelmed, their executive function goes down. They cannot listen. They cannot process high level medical information.
Clinician response to dysregulation can lead to to an unfortunate feedback loop:
Trigger>>>> Arousal>>>> Behavior>>>>Clinician Response>>>Trigger
We are not neutral. We are human beings too.
Countertransference is the phenomenon in which our own emotional reaction to the patient is shaped by our own previous experiences. This can lead to helplessness, frustration, avoidance, over compensation, and assertion of control.
We must strike a balance between empathy and limits/boundaries. Empathy does not require agreement. Most people do better with limits and effective boundary setting helps people who are dysregulated. Rather than being exclusive, empathy and boundaries are complementary.
3 steps to empathic boundary setting:
- Validate the emotion
- Set clear limits (without excessive justification-- see above, people's ability to tolerate info is low)
- Offer alternatives (a small # of choices) to give control back
Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis (Hamann 7/23/2026)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
***
Thanks so much to Dr. Kendal Hamann, SMGR Endocrinologist, for an outstanding Grand Rounds presentation on Osteoporosis. Dr. Hamann covered the basics and the nuances of osteoporosis diagnosis, reminded us that the DEXA scan results are only part of the clinical picture, and clarified when bisphosphonates should be first vs. second line.
Please watch the recorded version above if you want all the details.
4 clinical pearls:
- Use the FRAX score (10 year fracture score) to guide who should be treated for osteoporosis
- Even patients whose T score doesn't improve on bisphosphonates, there is a 30-50% decrease in fractures
- Rebound fractures are real. Never start denosumab (Prolia) without a plan for bisphosphonates after completion
- Check DEXA 2-5 years into treatment, at start of drug holiday (which is generally 5 years into bisphosphonates), then 2-5 years later
Osteoporosis= decreased BONE STRENGTH, which is a combination of Bone DENSITY (BMD) + Bone TURNOVER + Bone ARCHITECTURE
Normal BMD T>1.0, osteopenia BMD 1>T>-2.5, osteoporosis T<-2.5
Diagnosis of osteoporosis=- Fragility fracture (most commonly, fracture of wrist spine, hip from standing height)
- T-score of <-2.5 by DEXA scan.
- Of note, 50% of people with fragility fractures will NOT meet criteria by DEXA
- Vertebral fractures cause pain, loss of mobility, loss of height, even restrictive lung disease and abdominal issues. Plus, once you have a vertebral fracture, you have 20% risk of a second one in the next year.
- Hip fractures: 30% 1 year mortality (higher in men), 40% of people never walk independently after hip fx, 25% wind up needing care in long-term care facility
- FRAX: >3% risk of hip fracture, >20% risk of any fracture are indications for treatment
- Usng a T score of <-2.5, about 30% of menopausal women will qualify as having osteoporosis
- 1/2 of women with fragility fracture do not qualify as having osteoporosis on DEXA (i.e. T score will be >-2.5)
- Indications for DEXA:
- women and trans-people >65
- men >70
- any adult over 50 with a fragility fracture
- monitoring treatment
- lots of other people:
- primary hyperparathyroidism
- chronic steroids
- hypogonadism
- premature menopause
- longstanding hyperthyroidism
- celiac disease
- pregnancy w/fragility fracture
- people on GnRH agonists
Bisphosphonates are the mainstay of osteoporosis treatment. They inhibit osteoclast. Data for fracture risk reduction is robust-- decreased fracture risk 30-50% reduction after about 6 months on bisphosphonates. Cost is low. We have 25+ years of experience now with these meds.
When to consult endocrinology?
Spine Surgery for the PCP (Athanassious, 7/15/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
-Physical therapy
From Reactive to Proactive: Building Systems to Prevent Patient Harm and Improve Quality of Care (Krishan, 5/27/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Human Papilloma Virus: what's new in 2026? (Jordan, 5/20/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Cardio-Obstetrics (Soneji, 5/13/26)
Thanks so much to Dr. Nisha Soneji, a new local expert in Cardio-Obstetrics! She joined SMGR in the fall and gave us a great presentation this week that was very family medicine friendly-- on the overlap of cardiovascular disease (hypertension, pre-E, valvular disease) and the peripartum time. It's a great presentation, and she is going to be an awesome resource to have here in our community.
"Pregnancy itself is a major stress test-- you are basically on a treadmill all the time".
US has a shocking rate of maternal mortality-- the highest among developed countries, 49.5/100K live births (highest for black women in the US) and CVD is the major contributor to maternal mortality. Significant racial and ethnic disparities are seen: black women 2.6x risk of death compared to white women. Advancing maternal age increases risk of maternal mortality (87.1 death/100K births)
CVD accounts for 33% of all maternal deaths. Whereas infectious risk of maternal mortality have decreased over the last decade, CVD related deaths are increasing, 2/3rds are considered preventable.
Most common cause of CVD death:
- congenital heart disease
- ischemic heart disease
- valvular heart disease (esp stenotic disease: aortic stenosis, mitral stenosis)
- hypertensive heart disease
- congestive heart failure (peripartum cardiomyopathy, esp post partum)Contributing factors; delayed response to warnings (pregnancy symptoms mimic CVD), ineffective care, misdiagnosis, lack of continuity post partum (risk continues up to 6 months after delivery)
CV changes during pregnancy: "Pregnancy itself is a major stress test-- you are basically on a treadmill all the time". If you are at risk for CVD, in can present in pregnancy or post partum.
See image below:
Normal findings in pregnancy: systolic murmur, elevated JVP, displaced apex, edema, increase in chambers on TTE, small pericardial effusion
NOT normal in pregnancy: S4, diastolic murmur, fixed splitting second heart sound, moderate to large pericardial effusionNOTABLY Unchanged in pregnancy: LVEF, REF, PASP
American College Cardiology
Who should be referred to Cardio-OB?
change in functional status
asthma not responsive to therapy
palpitations
chest pain/tightness that doesn't improve
syncope
SBP not controlled on med
oxygen saturation <90%
hx chemo can lead to HF in pregnant women (10% risk)
existing cardiac conditions: valvular disease, CHF
Risk Assessment:
Modified WHO 2.0 risk calculator
CARPREG
Who doesn't need referral: isolated sinus tachycardia, benign ectopy, mild hypertension managed on meds, normal BNP or TTE. If in doubt, refer!
Preconception counseling: high risk patients should get preconception counseling when risk of death is so high that they really should NOT get pregnant.
Assess risk
medication review (cannot use ACE/ARB)
genetic consultation (if CHD, increased risk of fetal CHD)Testing:
TTE: echo is first line monitoring tool
Troponin, BNP not routinely monitor, but good idea to check baseline if risk factors and/or symptoms. Can then compare post partum to antepartum BNP. Troponin can be ordered routine at the lab.BNP>200 can be normal in pregnancy
BNP >300 VERY suggestive of heart failure
CXR for shortness of breath
Treadmill stress tests in pregnancy can be done safely
Zio/holter
CT chest with angiogram can be considered if benefit>> risk
Hypertension in pregnancy
Chronic hypertension (<20 weeks), gestational hypertension (>20 weeks), preE (+organ dysfunction, Pre-Eclampsia with severe features, Eclampsia (with seizures)
BP Goal <140/90
Daily low dose ASA during pregnancy for preE/eclampsia prevention >12 weeks EGA in moderate to high risk patients
Benefit>>Risk
Pre E: 71% increased risk CVD, 2.5 risk CAD, 4x risk HF
Meds for BP: labetolol (shouldn't be used in asthma, decompensated cardiac function), can use nifedipine
Arrythmias
pregnancy increases aryrthmias due to increased blood flow and hormonal changes. Most common CV complication. Increases with age >41 years.
Preventable
SVT: vagal maneuvers, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, digoxin (can be added if BB don't work) flecainide
Defer ablation to post partum (due to risk)
Afib: BB, digoxin, 2nd line calcium channel blockers, can be safely cardioverted
Can get implanted devices if need pacemaker
Heart Failure should be treated during pregnancy, cannot be deferred to post partum
-bad outcomes for moms and babies
Peripartum Cardiomyopathy
diagnosis of exclusion
new EF <45% without reversible cause
RF: maternal age, htn, preE, prior cardiomyopathy
present in 3rd trimester to 1 month (up to 6 months PP)
20% recurrence rate, contraception is important
risk of death 5-10% at 1 year
most people with recover EF, but future pregnancy brings higher risk
Meds: loop diuretic, hydralazine, isosorbide dinitrite, digoxin, beta blocker, ((IV dobutamine can be used), AVOID: ACE/ARB/ARNI, SGLT2
Vaginal delivery is recommended unless cardiogenic shock (safer than LTCS)
Valvular Disease
preconception counseling important, especially with L side valve disease (even if asymptomatic)
send to cardiology, need to get stress test pre-conception
TTE q trimester for mild-mod valve disease
R sided valvular disease (e.g. TR), need fetal echo, rarely need intervention>> vaginal delivery preferred
L sided valvular disease: regurgitation well-tolerated, stenotic disease NOT well tolerated in pregnancy (e.g. AS or MS, even if mild). At high risk for atrial arrhthmias
CAD in pregnancy
1/10K hospitalizations after pregnancy
Risk increases 3x
RF: age, black race, eclampsia/preE, known CAD, traditional risk factors (e.g. DM)
Spontaneous dissection (SCAD) most common cause of pregnancy-related MI (conservative tx recommended)
Gout: An Update (Maniscalco, 5/6/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Thanks to Dr. David Maniscalco, SMGR Endocrinologist, for an update on Management of Gout.
| 1st MTP |
Common signs/symptoms
- 80% of gout is monoarticular process (single ankle, knee, 1st MTP, wrist, olecranon bursa)
- significant pain ("cannot even let a bedsheet touch it")
- red/hot/swollen
- flares commonly overnight and early morning (pts may describe this)
tophaceous gout: pts who haven't received care as outpatient, develop significant tophi, pain can hit critical point with severe pain
Diagnosis
- ideal: presence of uric acid crystals on synovial fluid analysis (crystal-proven gout)
- less ideal: often diagnosed on typical clinical presentation + hyperuricemia
Management
Based on 2020 American College of Rheumatology Guidelines for Management of Gout
Indications for urate lowering therapy:
- 2 or more gout flares within a year
- no need to start after first attack>> monitor and see if repeated attacks
- tophaceous gout (rheum should manage)
- radiographic damage attributable to gout (erosions on x-ray)
- hx multiple flares over time (even if <2/year)
- first gout flare with CKD >3
- uric acid >9 (significantly high) or hx nephrolithiasis
Urate lowering therapy:
- Allopurinol is PREFERRED first-line agent
- recommended including for pts with CKD>3 (safe)
- allopurinol does not cause kidney injury (safe in AKI as well)>> decreased GFR can increase risk of side effects, e.g. severe cutaneous reactions (Stevens Johnson, DRESS), which are rare but do happen>> lower dose if rash develops
- in pts of southeast Asian descent (Han Chinese, Korean, Thai) and African American>> check for alelle HLA B5801 before starting allopurinol
- Feboxostat is used as an alternative to allopurinol
- previously concerned recommended for patients with CKD>> now no longer an indication
- used rarely
- per current guidelines, contraindicated in pts with hx CVD (increases risk of CV death, mixed data)
Goal uric acid <6mg/dl (for non-tophaceous) <5mg/dl (for tophaceous, managed by rheum)
- starting dose: allopurinol 100mg daily (lowest dose), feboxostat 40mg daily (lowest dose)
- decreases risk of hypersensitivity reactions, decreased risk of flares with initiation
- there is no inherent danger in increasing allopurinol>> max dose 800mg
- max dose of feboxostat is 80mg
- about 1/3 of patients will be at goal with 300mg allopurinol
- for pts with CKD3, start with 50mg allopurinol (titrate up by 50 mg/month until goal uric acid)
- There is NO need to stop allopurinol in AKI in hospitalized patients
- can lead to gout flares and do not worsen AKI
Colchicine is first line most effective within first 36 hours of flare (doesn't work better if started after): 1.2mg, followed by 0.6 mg 1 hour later, then 0.6mg BID until flare resolves
If not resolving, transition to prednisone
If attack is going >48 hours, choose something other than colchicine (prednisone preferred)
Prednisone: 0.5mg/kg 2-5 days, then taper over 7-10 days
NSAID: naproxen 500mg BID, indomethacin okay (often cannot be used due to comorbidities)
ICE!!!!
Medication Prophylaxis
- Any time you are starting urate lowering therapy, you need prophylaxis at the same time!!
- Colchicine is preferred agent for ppx: 0.6mg daily, okay in CKD (CrCl<30, 0.3mg/daily or 0.6mg qod)
- If cannot do colchicine (diarrhea is common), NSAID, e.g. Naproxen 200 or 250mg BID (limited by CKD)
- Last option is prednisone for those who cannot tolerate colchicine or NSAID: pred 2.5-7.5mg (usually start with 5mg), if worried about diabetes, try to get away with lower dose (e.g. 2.5mg daily)
- Titrate up q2-4 weeks (with uric acid via lab to direct)
Lots of crystal still in joint, take a long time to dissolve, people tend to have flares until treated for a long time
Medication monitoring
Allopurinol is safe (stop if rash), CBC/CMP after initiation, liver issues are not much of an issue, can monitor periodically q6-12 months (CBC, CMP), more frequently if renal impairment. Similar for colchicine.
Diet: low purine diet, low alcohol, reduce high fructose corn syrup, no concrete evidence on cherry juice, avoid red meats/organ meats/scallops, mussels, meaty fish
HCTZ increases uric acid>> change and may help uric acid improve
Losartan is gout-friendly-- evidence it decreases uric acid
- No need to stop urate lowering therapy while having a gout flare
- No need to stop urate lowering therapy in AKI (can lead to bad flare)
- Okay to start urate lowering therapy DURING a gout flare (despite what UptoDate says)
- Colchicine is safe and NOT highly toxic and can be safely taken as long as adjusted for renal impairment, drug interactions
polyarticular gout
tophaceous gout
unable to be treated with allopurinol/feboxostat
Hooray for Generalism Finding Meaning and Purpose in a World of Hyper-Specialization (Gerlach, 4/15/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Immigration Status and Negative Health Impacts (Yadira Raya-Cervantes, 4/1/2026)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Northern California Center for Well Being: HeartWorks Cardiac Rehabilitation Program (Roosen, 3/25/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Thanks so much to Erin Roosen, program manager for our local Center for Well-Being's Cardiac Rehabilitation Program, HeartWorks, located at 500 Doyle Park Drive, Santa Rosa 95405. She gave an inspiring presentation on the value of Cardiac Rehabilitation. She certainly inspired me to give a more robust bedside recommendation for my cardiac patients.
Cardiac Rehabilitation is an evidence-based intervention that literally saves lives. . .
HeartWorks offers:
- A 3 month focused exercise program for patients with heart failure, any cardiac procedure (valve replacement or repair, stent, CABG), and recent STEMI/NSTEMI
- Cardiac rehab
- decreases need for hospitalization by 25%
- helps people increase activity level
- improve quality of life (65% improvement on PHQ9)
- improves diet
- decreases mortality (47% decrease in mortality if you complete the program, compared to attending only 1 session)
- Cardiac rehab includes pre and post exercise vitals and 3 lead EKG monitoring
- Phase II is 36 sessions (2-3 days/ per week, depending on availability): goal is to improve aerobic capacity (by increasing the 6 minute walk test and/or improve MET levels). This is generally covered by Medicare insurance
- Phase III is an additional 3 month non-monitored program paid for by participants (24 sessions, 2/week)
- Once participants complete cardiac rehab, they are offered a 3 month voucher for our local YMCA
Update on Hormonal Treatment of Menopause (Mason, 3/18/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
Many thanks to Dr. Antoinette Mason for an important presentation on Hormonal Treatment of Menopause. Dr. Mason is a graduate of our residency program and is also a graduate of our integrative medicine fellowship.
Her stated goal of the presentation: to empower clinicians to use menopausal hormonal therapy (MHT)
Before 2002, menopausal patients regularly received MHT. After 2002, when the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) was stopped early due to concerns regarding increased rates of breast cancer, blood clots, dementia, CVD and more. This led to a lot of fear and an abrupt change in practice-- as a result, most clinicians have been trained to avoid hormones in menopause.
Over the past 15 years, there has been lots of re-evaluation of the data. Also formulations of hormones used today are not the same as those used in the WHI. Timing matters, age of start matters.
We are now reckoning with fear, beliefs, lack of evidence, training. . .many of our leading organizations (Menopause Society, ACOG, Endocrine Society) have guidelines that confirm that MHT is safe and appropriate for many populations.
bio-identical means "same compounds made by the ovaries" (estradiol (E2) + micronized progesterone), but there are LOT of different formulations of these as well.
Risks of MHT:
- blood clots: associated with oral estrogen (including OCPs, conjugated equine estrogen, oral estradiol). Oral estradiol safer than OCPs, 3-4x risk OCP vs. oral estradiol. But transdermal (patches, gels, cream) do NOT increase risk of blood clots.
- gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, low but increased
- endometrial hyperplasia/cancer: unopposed estrogen therapy (need to give estrogen therapy)
- breast cancer: WHI showed small increase in rate of breast cancer, but estrogen alone actually reduced breast cancer. Risk for breast cancer seems driven by progestin >5 years (when use mircorinized progesterone NO increased risk of breast cancer but no good RCTs). Safest approach: use MHT<5 years. We may never have RCT with clear data.
Hormonal Cheat Sheet:
FDA approved indications for MHT:- vasomotor symptoms: hot flashes, night sweats
- genitourinary syndrome of menopause: urinary/vaginal symptoms, dyspareunia
- prevention of osteoporosis in people who are high risk (e.g. family hx, comorbidities), do NOT treat osteoporosis but does prevent fractures
- treatment of early ovarian failure or surgical menopause
- musculoskeletal syndrome of menopause: changes in joints, connective tissues, muscles (pain, stiffness, new joint pain that is NOT arthritis)
- mood/cognitive changes/sleep
- quality of life
- miscellaneous short and long impacts: fractures, colon cancer, breast cancer (estrogen alone), diabetes, improvement in insulin resistance, better blood glucose control for people with DM, LDL reduction (transdermal estradiol), reduced CVD, dementia (mixed studies, ?vascular)
- use bio-identical hormones
- use transdermal estrogen whenever possible
- start early, use lowest effective dose (titrate to symptom control)
- Do they need birth control or do they not want to ovulate? (if yes, consider IUD/OCPs)
- Do they have a uterus? (if yes, they need some progesterone)
- Are they having regular cycles? (if yes, luteal dosing of progesterone, if no, can use continuous progesterone)
Common Progesterone side effects: constipation (fiber/magnesium/water), morning grogginess (can try earlier in the evening, switch to vaginal formulation)
Estrogen Decline
estrogen decline symptoms: vaginal symptoms, hot flashes, irregular period
Can start estradiol (start with lowest patch>> twice weekly better than once weekly, smaller, adhesive less sticky). Currently supply chain issue, harder to get right now
Follow up 4-8 weeks because hot flashes should respond quickly>> if they don't get better, need more estrogen
Vaginal Estrogen
Vaginal estrogen should be used liberally for genito-urinary symptoms of menopause. Vaginal estrogen can be used SAFELY for almost everyone, including post partum. Can decrease UTIs in elders. Cheap, easy, effective tool. Note there are TWO vaginal rings (one rx'd for local therapy, one for systemic therapy. Make sure you know which you are rx'ing)
OB and GYN update: highlights and practice changing articles from 2025 (Lund & Bacon, 3/11/2026)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE.
(late entry)
Many thanks to Drs. Allison Bacon and Erin Lund for an excellent review of important practice-changing literature from the fields of OB and Gyn in 2025. It's obviously important for us to keep track of practice-changing advances, but the task can be overwhelming and burdensome, particularly if it's an area you are not using on a daily basis.
Dr. Bacon started us off with 3 practice-changing OB papers:
1) Quality-Improvement (QI) Strategies for the Safe Prevention of Preterm Birth, ACOG Committee Statement 17, May 2025
Key take homes:
- current US NTSVD (normal term spontaneous vaginal delivery) rate is 25.6% but ranges 18.5-84.6%, and the WHO goal is 23.6%>> the variability represents opportunity for improvement through local QI projects
- in fact the CMQCC initiative in California reduced rates from 26% to 22.8% (from 2014 to 2019)
- suggested strategies to improve vaginal delivery:
- local policies and procedures to support vaginal birth
- labor support huddles
- team trainings for interpretation of fetal heart rate monitoring
- unit based policies for oxytocin and management of labor dystocia
2) FIGO good practice recommendations on preconception care: A strategy to prevent preterm birth, Int'l Journal of Gynecology/Obs 2025
- preterm delivery is responsible for most neonatal and infant deaths
- many risk factors for preterm birth can be targeted outside of pregnancy
- baby-centered assessment as a part of preconception care
- examples risk factors and interventions
- teen pregnancies>> preconception counseling
- optimize screening/treatment of chronic conditions (e.g. hypertension, DM, thyroid)
- mental health>> screen for mental health and eating disorders
- infectious disease>> HPV vaccination, screen for STIs, preserve oral health
- nurtitional status>> discuss BMI, dx/tx iron-deficiency
3) Air Pollution Linked to Risk of Spontaneous Preterm Birth, Celeste Krewson, 2025, Contemporary Ob/gyn
- talk to patients about PM2.5 as mechanism for for social drivers of health, use of air filters?
- solutions driven by housing, community, city planning
Dr. Lund presented the second half on the important gyn literature:
- healthcare professionals tend to underestimate the pain people with uterus may feel during a procedure, providers may deem pain management not needed and therefore not offer to patients
- despite discrepancy between level of pain between patients and providers, patients still do report high degree of satisfaction with in-office gyn procedures
- higher pre-procedural anxiety and anticipated pain are
- associated with higher pain scores
- THEREFORE options for pain management should be offered to all patients for in-office procedures
- IUD: topical anesthetic is more effective over placebo or misoprostol
- lidocaine spray>> lidocaine injection (?2017 RCT)
- no evidence to support pre-procedure NSAID, though may help for post-procedure pain
- use of ultrasound has been shown to decrease pain of IUD insertion
- EMB: 10% lidocaine spray (3 puffs before), naproxen 30 minutes prior reduced pain in one study, performing EMB with full bladder may reduce pain
- Uterine aspiration: paracervical block, NSAIDs pre-procedure (for post-procedure pain), oral benzos do not reduce pain but do reduce anxiety
- Colpo: topical/intracervical lidocaine recommended for biopsies and LEEP
- Trauma-informed care: universal trauma precautions, given patients control over procedure, ask permission to begin/continue procedure, careful with words used (e.g. not bed, table)
- Recurrence is common! 66% of patients experience recurrence of BV within 12 months of initial diagnosis
- Recent RCT comparing partner therapy for recurrent BV (treating partner with oral and topical) showed marked decrease in recurrence (35% vs. 65% at 12 weeks), absolute risk was BIG -2.6 recurrences per person per year
- Increasing evidence that BV should be considered an STI: predominantly occurring in sexually active populations, associated with new/multiple sexual partners, there is microbiological evidence that sexual partners exchange bacteria
- Ideal people to partner treat: monogamous male/female partners (shared decision making for other scenarios)
- Coverage may vary-- CA extended partner therapy applies to STIs (GC/CT), MAY be applied to BV (pharmacy dependent)
- Note clindamycin gel can weaken latex condoms
- Also note, recent evidence based guidelines say it's okay to drink alcohol and take metronidazole!!
Inflammatory Bowel Disease (Memel, 8/19/26)
A recording of this presentation is available HERE .
-
A recording of this presentation is available HERE . Many thanks to Dr. Andrew Brown, who gave an excellent Grand Rounds presentation this w...
-
Great thanks to Dr. Jose Maldonado, a Stanford psychiatrist and neuropsychiatrist, who literally wrote the benzodiazepine-sparing alcohol wi...